Cognitive bias and paw preference in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris

Deborah Wells, Peter Hepper, Adam D. S. Milligan, Shanis Barnard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
3002 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Limb use, an indicator of hemispheric functioning, may be a useful predictor of cognitive bias and hence vulnerability to welfare risk. The relationship between cognitive bias and motor asymmetry, however, has been subject to little investigation. This study explored the association between motor asymmetry and cognitive bias in the domestic dog, a species that displays lateral bias in the form of paw preferences and exhibits positive and negative affective states. Thirty pet dogs had their paw preferences assessed using the KongTM ball test. The subjects’ affective state was assessed using a cognitive bias test in which the animals’ latency to approach a bowl placed in one of three ambiguous positions was recorded. Animals veering more towards a left-paw preference were found to be significantly slower to approach the bowl placed in one of the ambiguous positions than ambilateral or right-pawed dogs. Left-pawed subjects approached the bowl located at the 3 ambiguous positions at roughly the same speed, while ambilateral and right-pawed animals became increasingly slower to approach the bowl the further it was located from the baited food bowl. The study points to a possible relationship between cognitive bias and paw preference in the dog, with left-pawed animals being more negative or “pessimistic” in their cognitive outlook than right-pawed or ambilateral individuals. It is proposed that limb preference testing might offer a more practical and straightforward way of identifying individuals at risk from poor welfare by virtue of how they perceive the world than more time-consuming cognitive bias tests.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-325
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Comparative Psychology
Volume131
Issue number4
Early online date18 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 18 May 2017

Fingerprint

Dogs
dogs
limb
animal
asymmetry
Extremities
Animal Rights
limbs (animal)
Pets
vulnerability
animal tests
risk groups
Food
testing
food
dog
animal welfare
pets
animals
test

Cite this

Wells, Deborah ; Hepper, Peter ; Milligan, Adam D. S. ; Barnard, Shanis. / Cognitive bias and paw preference in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. In: Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 131, No. 4. pp. 317-325.
@article{e7d776567fa743fea3a39754d42339d0,
title = "Cognitive bias and paw preference in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris",
abstract = "Limb use, an indicator of hemispheric functioning, may be a useful predictor of cognitive bias and hence vulnerability to welfare risk. The relationship between cognitive bias and motor asymmetry, however, has been subject to little investigation. This study explored the association between motor asymmetry and cognitive bias in the domestic dog, a species that displays lateral bias in the form of paw preferences and exhibits positive and negative affective states. Thirty pet dogs had their paw preferences assessed using the KongTM ball test. The subjects’ affective state was assessed using a cognitive bias test in which the animals’ latency to approach a bowl placed in one of three ambiguous positions was recorded. Animals veering more towards a left-paw preference were found to be significantly slower to approach the bowl placed in one of the ambiguous positions than ambilateral or right-pawed dogs. Left-pawed subjects approached the bowl located at the 3 ambiguous positions at roughly the same speed, while ambilateral and right-pawed animals became increasingly slower to approach the bowl the further it was located from the baited food bowl. The study points to a possible relationship between cognitive bias and paw preference in the dog, with left-pawed animals being more negative or “pessimistic” in their cognitive outlook than right-pawed or ambilateral individuals. It is proposed that limb preference testing might offer a more practical and straightforward way of identifying individuals at risk from poor welfare by virtue of how they perceive the world than more time-consuming cognitive bias tests.",
author = "Deborah Wells and Peter Hepper and Milligan, {Adam D. S.} and Shanis Barnard",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1037/com0000080",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
pages = "317--325",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Psychology",
issn = "0735-7036",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Cognitive bias and paw preference in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. / Wells, Deborah; Hepper, Peter; Milligan, Adam D. S. ; Barnard, Shanis.

In: Journal of Comparative Psychology, Vol. 131, No. 4, 18.05.2017, p. 317-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive bias and paw preference in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris

AU - Wells, Deborah

AU - Hepper, Peter

AU - Milligan, Adam D. S.

AU - Barnard, Shanis

PY - 2017/5/18

Y1 - 2017/5/18

N2 - Limb use, an indicator of hemispheric functioning, may be a useful predictor of cognitive bias and hence vulnerability to welfare risk. The relationship between cognitive bias and motor asymmetry, however, has been subject to little investigation. This study explored the association between motor asymmetry and cognitive bias in the domestic dog, a species that displays lateral bias in the form of paw preferences and exhibits positive and negative affective states. Thirty pet dogs had their paw preferences assessed using the KongTM ball test. The subjects’ affective state was assessed using a cognitive bias test in which the animals’ latency to approach a bowl placed in one of three ambiguous positions was recorded. Animals veering more towards a left-paw preference were found to be significantly slower to approach the bowl placed in one of the ambiguous positions than ambilateral or right-pawed dogs. Left-pawed subjects approached the bowl located at the 3 ambiguous positions at roughly the same speed, while ambilateral and right-pawed animals became increasingly slower to approach the bowl the further it was located from the baited food bowl. The study points to a possible relationship between cognitive bias and paw preference in the dog, with left-pawed animals being more negative or “pessimistic” in their cognitive outlook than right-pawed or ambilateral individuals. It is proposed that limb preference testing might offer a more practical and straightforward way of identifying individuals at risk from poor welfare by virtue of how they perceive the world than more time-consuming cognitive bias tests.

AB - Limb use, an indicator of hemispheric functioning, may be a useful predictor of cognitive bias and hence vulnerability to welfare risk. The relationship between cognitive bias and motor asymmetry, however, has been subject to little investigation. This study explored the association between motor asymmetry and cognitive bias in the domestic dog, a species that displays lateral bias in the form of paw preferences and exhibits positive and negative affective states. Thirty pet dogs had their paw preferences assessed using the KongTM ball test. The subjects’ affective state was assessed using a cognitive bias test in which the animals’ latency to approach a bowl placed in one of three ambiguous positions was recorded. Animals veering more towards a left-paw preference were found to be significantly slower to approach the bowl placed in one of the ambiguous positions than ambilateral or right-pawed dogs. Left-pawed subjects approached the bowl located at the 3 ambiguous positions at roughly the same speed, while ambilateral and right-pawed animals became increasingly slower to approach the bowl the further it was located from the baited food bowl. The study points to a possible relationship between cognitive bias and paw preference in the dog, with left-pawed animals being more negative or “pessimistic” in their cognitive outlook than right-pawed or ambilateral individuals. It is proposed that limb preference testing might offer a more practical and straightforward way of identifying individuals at risk from poor welfare by virtue of how they perceive the world than more time-consuming cognitive bias tests.

U2 - 10.1037/com0000080

DO - 10.1037/com0000080

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 317

EP - 325

JO - Journal of Comparative Psychology

JF - Journal of Comparative Psychology

SN - 0735-7036

IS - 4

ER -