Colliding employer-employee perspectives of employee turnover: evidence from a born-global industry

Vijay Pereira*, Ashish Malik, Kajal Sharma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Set in the context of internationalization of the global division of labor, this article provides a deeper exploration of qualitative themes of conflicting accounts of employees’ reasons to quit and managerial strategies to prevent employee turnover in six business process outsourcing firms operating in India. Such differences in cognition and action between the two constituencies suggest that the decision to quit is not a linear and rational process as highlighted in most extant models of employee turnover. Our findings suggest that employees are attached more to a place or people they work with rather than the organization per se. Intergenerational differences between Generation Y knowledge workers and Generation X managers and the ineffectiveness of espoused human resource practices suggest the presence of “push” human resource management (HRM) systems. Our findings have implications for employee turnover models, intergenerational theory and high-commitment HRM, and practitioners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)601-615
Number of pages15
JournalThunderbird International Business Review
Volume58
Issue number6
Early online date10 Sept 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

  • Employee Turnover
  • HRM
  • Indian IT/BPO Industry
  • Inter-generational differences
  • Qualitative Methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Colliding employer-employee perspectives of employee turnover: evidence from a born-global industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this