Combined associations of a polygenic risk score and classical risk factors with breast cancer risk

Pooja Middha Kapoor, Nasim Mavaddat, Parichoy Pal Choudhury, Amber N Wilcox, Sara Lindström, Sabine Behrens, Kyriaki Michailidou, Joe Dennis, Manjeet K Bolla, Qin Wang, Audrey Jung, Zomoroda Abu-Ful, Thomas Ahearn, Irene L Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Volker Arndt, Kristan J Aronson, Paul L Auer, Laura E Beane Freeman, Heiko BecherMatthias W Beckmann, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Javier Benitez, Leslie Bernstein, Stig E Bojesen, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Thomas Brüning, Qiuyin Cai, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Angel Carracedo, Brian D Carter, Jose E Castelao, Stephen J Chanock, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Christine L Clarke, Fergus J Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S Cross, Kamila Czene, James Y Dai, H Shelton Earp, Arif B Ekici, A Heather Eliassen, Mikael Eriksson, David J Hunter, Michael E Jones, Nick Orr, ABCTB Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)
104 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We evaluated the joint associations between a new 313-variant PRS (PRS313) and questionnaire-based breast cancer risk factors for women of European ancestry, using 72,284 cases and 80,354 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Interactions were evaluated using standard logistic regression, and a newly developed case-only method, for breast cancer risk overall and by estrogen receptor status. After accounting for multiple testing, we did not find evidence that per-standard deviation PRS313 odds ratio differed across strata defined by individual risk factors. Goodness-of-fit tests did not reject the assumption of a multiplicative model between PRS313 and each risk factor. Variation in projected absolute lifetime risk of breast cancer associated with classical risk factors was greater for women with higher genetic risk (PRS313 and family history), and on average 17.5% higher in the highest vs lowest deciles of genetic risk. These findings have implications for risk prevention for women at increased risk of breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Early online date02 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 02 May 2020

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combined associations of a polygenic risk score and classical risk factors with breast cancer risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this