The application of the contingent valuation method (CVM) in this paper incorporates a prior preference ordering of several alternative future afforestation programmes which could be implemented in Ireland over the next decade. This particular experimental design is thereby shown to reveal the potentially conflicting preferences of different groups within society. These findings are used to devise appropriate CVM scenarios to take account, not only of the efficiency gains of choosing a single policy alternative over others, but also the effects on the distribution of non market benefit between different groups within society, arising from choice between alternatives. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
|Number of pages||7|
|Journal||Journal of Rural Studies|
|Publication status||Published - 1999|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Sociology and Political Science
Hutchinson, G., & Chilton, S. M. (1999). Combining preference ordering and contingent valuation methods to assess non market benefit of alternative afforestation projects. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(1), 103-109.