TY - JOUR
T1 - Comfort Care Rounds: A Staff Capacity-Building Initiative in Long-Term Care Homes
AU - Wickson-Griffiths, Abigail
AU - Kaasalainen, Sharon
AU - Brazil, Kevin
AU - McAiney, Carrie
AU - Crawshaw, Diane
AU - Turner, Mickey
AU - Kelley, Mary Lou
PY - 2015/1
Y1 - 2015/1
N2 - This article reports a pilot evaluation of Comfort Care Rounds (CCRs)-a strategy for addressing long-term care home staff's palliative and end-of-life care educational and support needs. Using a qualitative descriptive design, semistructured individual and focus group interviews were conducted to understand staff members' perspectives and feedback on the implementation and application of CCRs. Study participants identified that effective advertising, interest, and assigning staff to attend CCRs facilitated their participation. The key barriers to their attendance included difficulty in balancing heavy workloads and scheduling logistics. Interprofessional team member representation was sought but was not consistent. Study participants recognized the benefits of attending; however, they provided feedback on how the scheduling, content, and focus could be improved. Overall, study participants found CCRs to be beneficial to their palliative and end-of-life care knowledge, practice, and confidence. However, they identified barriers and recommendations, which warrant ongoing evaluation.
AB - This article reports a pilot evaluation of Comfort Care Rounds (CCRs)-a strategy for addressing long-term care home staff's palliative and end-of-life care educational and support needs. Using a qualitative descriptive design, semistructured individual and focus group interviews were conducted to understand staff members' perspectives and feedback on the implementation and application of CCRs. Study participants identified that effective advertising, interest, and assigning staff to attend CCRs facilitated their participation. The key barriers to their attendance included difficulty in balancing heavy workloads and scheduling logistics. Interprofessional team member representation was sought but was not consistent. Study participants recognized the benefits of attending; however, they provided feedback on how the scheduling, content, and focus could be improved. Overall, study participants found CCRs to be beneficial to their palliative and end-of-life care knowledge, practice, and confidence. However, they identified barriers and recommendations, which warrant ongoing evaluation.
U2 - 10.3928/00989134-20140611-01
DO - 10.3928/00989134-20140611-01
M3 - Article
C2 - 24971588
VL - 41
JO - Journal of gerontological nursing
JF - Journal of gerontological nursing
SN - 0098-9134
IS - 1
ER -