Comment on “Energy levels, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities for sulfur-like scandium, Sc VI” by El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys. 91 1029 (2017)]

Kanti M. Aggarwal

doi:10.1007/s12648-020-01742-2

Comment on “Energy levels, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities for sulfur-like scandium, Sc VI” by El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys. 91 1029 (2017)]

Kanti M. Aggarwal^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Mathematics and Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this comment, through our independent calculations, we assess that the recently reported results of El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys.91 1029 (2017)] for energy levels, oscillator strengths, radiative rates, and lifetimes are inaccurate and unreliable for several levels and transitions of S-like Sc VI.

Original language	English
Journal	Indian Journal of Physics
Early online date	10 Jun 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-020-01742-2
Publication status	Early online date - 10 Jun 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

32.70.Cs
95.30.Ky
Energy levels
Lifetimes
Oscillator strengths
S-like scandium Sc VI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Physics and Astronomy

Access to Document

10.1007/s12648-020-01742-2Licence: CC BY

Comment on ‘‘Energy levels, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities for sulfur-like scandium, Sc VI’’ by El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys. 91 1029 (2017)]
Copyright 2020 the authors. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.
Final published version, 220 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{2a70c3631d7745a0af7e4871020e4d56,

title = "Comment on “Energy levels, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities for sulfur-like scandium, Sc VI” by El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys. 91 1029 (2017)]",

abstract = "In this comment, through our independent calculations, we assess that the recently reported results of El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys.91 1029 (2017)] for energy levels, oscillator strengths, radiative rates, and lifetimes are inaccurate and unreliable for several levels and transitions of S-like Sc VI.",

keywords = "32.70.Cs, 95.30.Ky, Energy levels, Lifetimes, Oscillator strengths, S-like scandium Sc VI",

author = "Aggarwal, {Kanti M.}",

year = "2020",

month = jun,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1007/s12648-020-01742-2",

language = "English",

journal = "Indian Journal of Physics",

issn = "0973-1458",

publisher = "Indian Physical Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on “Energy levels, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities for sulfur-like scandium, Sc VI” by El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys. 91 1029 (2017)]

AU - Aggarwal, Kanti M.

PY - 2020/6/10

Y1 - 2020/6/10

N2 - In this comment, through our independent calculations, we assess that the recently reported results of El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys.91 1029 (2017)] for energy levels, oscillator strengths, radiative rates, and lifetimes are inaccurate and unreliable for several levels and transitions of S-like Sc VI.

AB - In this comment, through our independent calculations, we assess that the recently reported results of El-Maaref et al. [Indian J. Phys.91 1029 (2017)] for energy levels, oscillator strengths, radiative rates, and lifetimes are inaccurate and unreliable for several levels and transitions of S-like Sc VI.

KW - 32.70.Cs

KW - 95.30.Ky

KW - Energy levels

KW - Lifetimes

KW - Oscillator strengths

KW - S-like scandium Sc VI

U2 - 10.1007/s12648-020-01742-2

DO - 10.1007/s12648-020-01742-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85086370389

SN - 0973-1458

JO - Indian Journal of Physics

JF - Indian Journal of Physics

ER -