Comment on Michael Schefczyk: In search of a just political economy: Why we should go beyond Rawls's POD and Schefczyk's RUWS

Fabian Schuppert*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

This commentary challenges Michael Schefczyk's proposal for a realistically Utopian welfare state (RIJWS). As it stands, RIJWS says too little about the concrete measures it will offer to avoid political domination and harmful inequalities. More¬over, RIJWS follows Rawlsian Property-Owning Democracy (POD) by being silent on crucial issues such as banking regulation, the governance of investments and the issue of actual control over capital. Ultimately, it therefore seems that RIJWS does not present an attractive alternative to POD since it suffers from very similar problems and shortcomings as POD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-217
Number of pages5
JournalAnalyse und Kritik
Volume2013
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on Michael Schefczyk: In search of a just political economy: Why we should go beyond Rawls's POD and Schefczyk's RUWS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this