Comment on: “Peatland carbon stocks and burn history: Blanket bog peat core evidence highlights charcoal impacts on peat physical properties and long‐term carbon storage,” by A. Heinemeyer, Q. Asena, W. L. Burn and A. L. Jones (Geo: Geography and Environment 2018; e00063)

Chris D. Evans*, Andy J. Baird, Sophie M. Green, Susan E. Page, Michael Peacock, Mark S. Reed, Neil L. Rose, Rob Stoneman, Tim J. Thom, Dylan M. Young, Mark H. Garnett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
46 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A recent paper by Heinemeyer et al. (2018) in this journal has suggested that the use of prescribed fire may enhance carbon accumulation in UK upland blanket bogs. We challenge this finding based on a number of concerns with the original manuscript including the lack of an unburned control, insufficient replication, unrecognised potential confounding factors, and potentially large inaccuracies in the core dating approach used to calculate carbon accumulation rates. We argue that burn-management of peatlands is more likely to lead to carbon loss than carbon gain.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere00075
JournalGeo: Geography and Environment
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on: “Peatland carbon stocks and burn history: Blanket bog peat core evidence highlights charcoal impacts on peat physical properties and long‐term carbon storage,” by A. Heinemeyer, Q. Asena, W. L. Burn and A. L. Jones (Geo: Geography and Environment 2018; e00063)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this