Communicating clinical trial outcomes: Effects of presentation method on physicians’ evaluations of new treatments

Francesco Marcatto, Jonathan Rolison, Donatella Ferrante

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


Physicians expect a treatment to be more effective when its clinical outcomes are described as relative rather than as absolute risk reductions. We examined whether effects of presentation method (relative vs. absolute risk reduction)
remain when physicians are provided the baseline risk information, a vital piece of statistical information omitted in previous studies. Using a between-subjects design, ninety five physicians were presented the risk reduction associated
with a fictitious treatment for hypertension either as an absolute risk reduction or as a relative risk reduction, with or without including baseline risk information. Physicians reported that the treatment would be more effective and that they would be more willing to prescribe it when its risk reduction was presented to them in relative rather than in absolute terms. The relative risk reduction was perceived as more effective than absolute risk reduction even when the baseline risk information was explicitly reported. We recommend that information about absolute risk reduction be made available to physicians in the reporting of clinical outcomes. Moreover, health professionals should be cognizant of the potential biasing effects of risk information presented in relative risk terms
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-33
Number of pages5
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Communicating clinical trial outcomes: Effects of presentation method on physicians’ evaluations of new treatments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this