Abstract
Highlights:
Positivity is no different for residents across wind energy development models;
Positivity is highly variable by case, requiring nuanced interpretation;
Distributive and procedural justice variables are significant, but inconsistent;
Aesthetics and links to climate change mitigation are the strongest predictors;
Community-based wind energy garners positivity when developer control is limited.
Positivity is no different for residents across wind energy development models;
Positivity is highly variable by case, requiring nuanced interpretation;
Distributive and procedural justice variables are significant, but inconsistent;
Aesthetics and links to climate change mitigation are the strongest predictors;
Community-based wind energy garners positivity when developer control is limited.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 114199 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Energy Policy |
| Volume | 191 |
| Early online date | 29 May 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Community-based wind energy development does not work? Empirical evidence from residents in Canada and Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver