Abstract
In this study, a comparison of different methods
to predict drug−polymer solubility was carried out on binary
systems consisting of five model drugs (paracetamol,
chloramphenicol, celecoxib, indomethacin, and felodipine)
and polyvinylpyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymers (PVP/VA)
of different monomer weight ratios. The drug−polymer
solubility at 25 °C was predicted using the Flory−Huggins
model, from data obtained at elevated temperature using
thermal analysis methods based on the recrystallization of a
supersaturated amorphous solid dispersion and two variations
of the melting point depression method. These predictions were compared with the solubility in the low molecular weight liquid analogues of the PVP/VA copolymer (N-vinylpyrrolidone and vinyl acetate). The predicted solubilities at 25 °C varied considerably depending on the method used. However, the three thermal analysis methods ranked the predicted solubilities in the same order, except for the felodipine−PVP system. Furthermore, the magnitude of the predicted solubilities from the recrystallization method and melting point depression method correlated well with the estimates based on the solubility in the liquid analogues, which suggests that this method can be used as an initial screening tool if a liquid analogue is available. The learnings of this important comparative study provided general guidance for the selection of the most suitable method(s) for the screening of drug−polymer solubility.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3408-3419 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Molecular Pharmaceutics |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 27 Jul 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 08 Sept 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Study of Different Methods for the Prediction of Drug− Polymer Solubility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Gavin Andrews
- School of Pharmacy - Head of School
- Material and Advanced Technologies for Healthcare
Person: Academic