Complementing and correcting representative institutions: When and how to use mini-publics.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In democratic theory and practice, it has become a popular view that designed deliberative mini‐publics can effectively counteract failures of representative democratic institutions. But when should mini‐publics be deployed, and how should they be designed? This article develops a framework for thinking about these questions. It argues that when representative democratic institutions ensure the empowerment of inclusions, enable the formation of collective agendas and wills, and are capable of translating those agendas into binding decisions, mini‐publics should be used sparingly and as complementary initiatives; the less representative institutions are able to serve these functions, the more mini‐publics should gain independence and standing to correct these problems. The article shows how this can be operationalised in light of two key institutional design issues – coupling and authority – and discusses some empirical examples that foreground the empirical leverage offered by the suggested framework
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
Early online date30 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 30 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

empowerment
inclusion

Cite this

@article{9fe1a3f9446d4d3fa0b6dbdd15d0caeb,
title = "Complementing and correcting representative institutions: When and how to use mini-publics.",
abstract = "In democratic theory and practice, it has become a popular view that designed deliberative mini‐publics can effectively counteract failures of representative democratic institutions. But when should mini‐publics be deployed, and how should they be designed? This article develops a framework for thinking about these questions. It argues that when representative democratic institutions ensure the empowerment of inclusions, enable the formation of collective agendas and wills, and are capable of translating those agendas into binding decisions, mini‐publics should be used sparingly and as complementary initiatives; the less representative institutions are able to serve these functions, the more mini‐publics should gain independence and standing to correct these problems. The article shows how this can be operationalised in light of two key institutional design issues – coupling and authority – and discusses some empirical examples that foreground the empirical leverage offered by the suggested framework",
author = "Jonathan Kuyper",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6765.12306",
language = "English",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
issn = "0304-4130",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complementing and correcting representative institutions: When and how to use mini-publics.

AU - Kuyper, Jonathan

PY - 2018/10/30

Y1 - 2018/10/30

N2 - In democratic theory and practice, it has become a popular view that designed deliberative mini‐publics can effectively counteract failures of representative democratic institutions. But when should mini‐publics be deployed, and how should they be designed? This article develops a framework for thinking about these questions. It argues that when representative democratic institutions ensure the empowerment of inclusions, enable the formation of collective agendas and wills, and are capable of translating those agendas into binding decisions, mini‐publics should be used sparingly and as complementary initiatives; the less representative institutions are able to serve these functions, the more mini‐publics should gain independence and standing to correct these problems. The article shows how this can be operationalised in light of two key institutional design issues – coupling and authority – and discusses some empirical examples that foreground the empirical leverage offered by the suggested framework

AB - In democratic theory and practice, it has become a popular view that designed deliberative mini‐publics can effectively counteract failures of representative democratic institutions. But when should mini‐publics be deployed, and how should they be designed? This article develops a framework for thinking about these questions. It argues that when representative democratic institutions ensure the empowerment of inclusions, enable the formation of collective agendas and wills, and are capable of translating those agendas into binding decisions, mini‐publics should be used sparingly and as complementary initiatives; the less representative institutions are able to serve these functions, the more mini‐publics should gain independence and standing to correct these problems. The article shows how this can be operationalised in light of two key institutional design issues – coupling and authority – and discusses some empirical examples that foreground the empirical leverage offered by the suggested framework

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6765.12306

DO - 10.1111/1475-6765.12306

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - European Journal of Political Research

JF - European Journal of Political Research

SN - 0304-4130

ER -