Abstract
The past two decades witnessed a global proliferation of national human rights and equality bodies.
Yet the research literature remains critical of their performance, positing a series of explanations
for the gap between the expectations of civil society and the contribution they make. Through a
comparative analysis of six statutory human rights and equality bodies in the United Kingdom
and Ireland, this article explores the range of factors that shape their performance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 89-107 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Policy & Politics |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01 Jan 2014 |