Crucial silences: When Accountability Met PFI and Finance Capital

Darinka Asenova, Matthias Beck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During recent years, a wide spectrum of research has questioned whether public services/infrastructure procurement through private finance, as exemplified by the UK Private Finance Initiative (PFI), meets minimum standards of democratic accountability. While broadly agreeing with some of these arguments, this paper suggests that this debate is flawed on two grounds. Firstly, PFI is not about effective procurement, or even about a pragmatic choice of procurement mechanisms which can potentially compromise public involvement and input; rather it is about a process where the state creates new profit opportunities at a time when the international financial system is increasingly lacking in safe investment opportunities. Secondly, because of its primary function as investment opportunity, PFI, by its very nature, prioritises the risk-return criteria of private finance over the needs of the public sector client and its stakeholders. Using two case studies of recent PFI projects, the paper illustrates some of the mechanisms through which finance capital exercises control over the PFI procurement process. The paper concludes that recent proposals aimed at “reforming” or “democratising” PFI fail to recognise the objective constraints which this type of state-finance capital nexus imposes on political process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalCritical Perspectives on Accounting
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Finance
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Crucial silences: When Accountability Met PFI and Finance Capital'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this