Abstract
Glass is a material inextricably linked with human civilization. It is also the product of an energy intensive industry. About 75%–85% of the total energy requirements to produce glass occur when the raw materials are heated in a furnace to more than 1500 °C. During this process, large volumes of emissions arise. The container and flat glass industries, which combined account for 80% of total glass production, emit over 60 million tonne of CO2 per year. However, environmental issues relating to the glass industry are not just limited to the manufacturing stage, but also from raw materials extraction, which impacts local ecosystems and creates other environmental challenges associated with tailing ponds, waste disposal and landfills. This systematic review poses five questions to examine these issues and themes: What alternatives exist to abate the climate effects of glass and thus make the full life cycle of glass more sustainable? What are the key determinants of energy and carbon from glass? What technical innovations have been identified to make glass manufacturing low to zero carbon? What benefits will amass from more carbon-friendly process in glass manufacturing, and what barriers will need tackling? To examine these questions, this study presents the findings of a comprehensive and critical systematic review of 701 studies (and a shorter sample of 375 studies examined in depth). A sociotechnical lens is used to assess glass manufacturing and use across multiple sectors (including buildings, automotive manufacturing, construction, electronics, and renewable energy), and options to decarbonize. The study identifies a number of barriers ranging from financial to infrastructural capacity, along with high potential avenues for future research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 111885 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews |
Volume | 155 |
Early online date | 03 Jan 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors would like to acknowledge support from the Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre (IDRIC) in the United Kingdom, funded via the ESRC and EPSRC via Grant EP/V027050/1. The authors also acknowledge The Bryden Centre project that is supported by the European Union's INTERREG VA Programme, managed by the Special EU Programmes Body (SEUPB). The authors would also like to thank Harrison Hampton for his support and valuable inputs
Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge support from the Industrial Decarbonisation Research and Innovation Centre (IDRIC) in the United Kingdom, funded via the ESRC and EPSRC via Grant EP/V027050/1 . The authors also acknowledge The Bryden Centre project that is supported by the European Union’s INTERREG VA Programme , managed by the Special EU Programmes Body (SEUPB) . The authors would also like to thank Harrison Hampton for his support and valuable inputs
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
- Climate change
- Climate mitigation
- Energy policy
- Glass
- Glass manufacturing
- Glass processes
- Industrial decarbonization
- Innovation
- Net-zero
- Sustainability transitions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment