Decomposing the educational gradient in allostatic load across European populations. What matters the most: differentials in exposure or in susceptibility?

Giovanni Veronesi, Frank Kee, Blanaid Hicks, Hannah Forrest, Hugh Tunstall-Pedoe, Kari Kuulasmaa, Susana Sans, Veikko Salomaa, Barbara Thorand, Augusto Di Castelnuovo, Stefan Soderberg, Giancarlo Cesana, Martin Bobak, Roberto De Ponti, Licia Iacoviello, Luigi Palmieri, Tanja Zeller, Stefan Blankenberg, Marco M Ferrario

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
168 Downloads (Pure)


Background: We investigate whether socially disadvantaged individuals are more susceptible to the detrimental effects of smoking and alcohol intake on allostatic load (AL), a marker of physiological “wear and tear”, resulting from adaptation to chronic stress.
Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis, 27019 men and 26738 women aged 35-74 were identified from 21 European cohorts in the BiomarCaRE consortium. We defined three educational classes (EDs) according to years of schooling and an AL score as the sum of z-scores of 8 selected biomarkers from the cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory systems. We used the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition to disentangle the educational class gradient in AL score into the differential exposure (DE, attributable to different distribution of smoking and alcohol intake across EDs) and the differential susceptibility (DS, attributable to a different effect of risk factors on AL across EDs) components.
Results: Less educated men (mean AL difference: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.57-0.79) and women (1.52, 1.40-1.64) had higher AL scores. DE accounted for 7% and 6% of the gradient in men and women, respectively. In men, combining smoking and alcohol intake, DS accounted for 42% of the gradient, (smoking DS coefficient=0.177, 26% of the gradient; alcohol DS coefficient=0.109; 16%, not statistically significant). DS contribution increased to 69% in metabolic markers. DS estimates were consistent across age groups; irrespective of comorbidities; and robust to unmeasured confounding. No DS was observed in women.
Conclusions: In men, a differential susceptibility mechanism substantially contributes to the educational class gradient in allostatic load.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1008-1015
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health
Issue number12
Early online date17 Aug 2020
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Decomposing the educational gradient in allostatic load across European populations. What matters the most: differentials in exposure or in susceptibility?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this