Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World: The Systemic Turn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The normative ideals and feasibility of deliberative democracy have come under attack from several directions, as exemplified by a recent book version of a special issue of this journal. Critics have pointed out that the complexity of the modern world, voter ignorance, partisanship, apathy, and the esoteric nature of political communications make it unlikely that deliberation will be successful at creating good outcomes, and that it may in fact be counterproductive since it can polarize opinions. However, these criticisms were aimed at “micro” theories of deliberative democracy. The new “systemic” turn in deliberative democracy avoids these problems by positing a system-wide division of labor in a nation-state: experts and ordinary citizens “check” each other's opinions; partisanship and even ignorance can spur deliberation among citizens; and citizens may remain apathetic about some issues but deliberate about others. So long as the overall level of systemic deliberation increases, instead of decreases, the ideal of deliberation is still relevant in a society as complex as ours.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-63
JournalCritical Review
Volume27
Issue number1
Early online date14 Jan 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

Cited By :10

Export Date: 19 September 2018

Correspondence Address: Kuyper, J.; Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, Universitetsvägen 10 F, Level 5, Sweden

Funding details: 200971 DII, ERC, European Research Council

Funding text: Jonathan Kuyper, jonathan.kuyper1@gmail.com, a Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, Universitetsvägen 10 F, Level 5, Stockholm, 106 91, gratefully acknowledges a European Research Council grant (200971 DII) for the Transaccess project, which enabled this research.

References: Bohman, J., Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy (1998) Journal of Political Philosophy, 6 (4), pp. 400-425; Chambers, S., The Many Faces of Good Citizenship (2013) Critical Review, 25 (2), pp. 199-209; Cohen, J., Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy (1997) Deliberative Democracy: Essays On Reason and Politics, , Bohman James, Rehg William, (eds), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; Dryzek, J.S., Theory, Evidence and the Tasks of Deliberation (2007) Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern?, , Rosenberg Shawn W., (ed), New York: Palgrave Macmillan; Dryzek, J.S., Rhetoric in Deliberation: A Systemic Appreciation (2010) Political Theory, 38 (3), pp. 319-339; Estlund, D., (2008) Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework, , Princeton: Princeton University Press; Goodin, R., Sequencing Deliberative Moments (2005) Acta Politica, 40 (2), pp. 182-196; Goodin, R., Dryzek, J.S., Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics (2006) Politics & Society, 34 (2), pp. 219-244; Gunn, P., (2013) Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World, , ed, New York: Routledge; Gutmann, A., Thompson, D., (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?, , Princeton: Princeton University Press; Habermas, J., (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, , Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; Landemore, H., (2012) Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many, , Princeton: Princeton University Press; Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Føllesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont, C., Martí, J.L., The Place of Self-interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy (2010) Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (1), pp. 64-100; Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D.F., Warren, M.E., (2012) A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy, , Parkinson and Mansbridge 2012; Muirhead, R., (2013) Can Deliberative Democracy Be Partisan?, , Gunn 2013; Mutz, D.C., Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory? (2008) Annual Review of Political Science, 11, pp. 521-538; Parkinson, J., Mansbridge, J., (2012) Deliberative Systems, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Pennington, M., (2013) Democracy and the Deliberative Conceit, , Gunn 2013; Pierson, P., (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, , Princeton: Princeton University Press; Prisching, M., (2013) Rational Democracy, Deliberation, and Reality, , Gunn 2013; Schkade, D., Sunstein, C.R., Hastie, R., (2013) When Deliberative Democracy Produces Extremism, , Gunn 2013; Somin, I., Knowledge about Ignorance: New Directions in the Study of Political Information (2006) Critical Review, 18 (1-3), pp. 255-278; Somin, I., (2013) Deliberative Democracy and Political Ignorance, , Gunn 2013; Talisse, R.B., (2013) An Epistemological Defense of Democracy, , Gunn 2013; Teles, S., Kludgeocracy in America (2013) National Affairs, 17, pp. 97-114; Vaughan, G.M., (2013) Incommunicative Action: An Esoteric Warning about Deliberative Democracy, , Gunn 2013; Warren, M., Voting with Your Feet: Exit-Based Empowerment in Democratic Theory (2011) American Political Science Review, 105 (4), pp. 683-701; White, J., Ypi, L., On Partisan Political Justification (2011) American Political Science Review, 105 (2), pp. 381-396; Young, I.M., (2000) Inclusion and Democracy, , Oxford: Oxford University Press

Keywords

  • citizen ignorance
  • deliberative democracy
  • deliberative systems
  • epistemic Democracy
  • institutional design
  • Jane Mansbridge
  • John Dryzek
  • Simone Chambers

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World: The Systemic Turn'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this