Detecting Voids within a Historical Building Façade: A Comparative Study of Three High Frequency GPR Antenna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
197 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ground penetrating radar is becoming an established component of the stone conservation researcher's arsenal. There is great potential in this quick and non-destructive technique that provides confirmation of deterioration features, such as voids, whose presence has been suggested using other tools. The past application of this technology has focused upon block scale stone deterioration, with less attention given to the study of features that extend across multiple blocks within the walls. The aim of this paper was to primarily to demonstrate the suitability of GPR for identifying void spaces when run across a rough surfaced wall façade. Additionally, this work aims to aid in the application of GPR for this purpose, by providing a comparison of three commonly used antennas to inform equipment choice during survey design. For this study, three high frequency antennas, 1.2 GHz, 1.6 GHz and 2.3 GHz, were run along the same perpendicular test lines across multiple blocks within a historical building façade. The resultant reflection profiles demonstrated that GPR can identify the presence of features within the blocks when run across a rough wall section. However, without the use of additional information from secondary data sources it is not possible to confirm the identity of features. The comparison of the three antennas, showed that the 1.6 GHz antenna was the least suited for this task, due to the presence of extensive ringing in the resultant reflection profiles. Alternatively, the 1.2 GHz antenna is most suitable for investigations deep within the wall and the 2.3 GHz better suits highly detailed analysis of features present within the near surface material. The choice of the most appropriate antenna depends upon the nature of the task it will be deployed for.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-123
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cultural Heritage
Volume32
Early online date21 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Ground penetrating radar systems
ground penetrating radar
void
antenna
voids
comparative study
antennas
Antennas
deterioration
Deterioration
rocks
Arsenals
ringing
survey design
Antenna grounds
profiles
Voids
Comparative Study
Historical Buildings
Comparative study

Keywords

  • Ground Penetrating Radar
  • Urban Weathering
  • Sandstone
  • Non Destructive Survey
  • Frequency comparison
  • Reflection Profiles

Cite this

@article{12e37be0902e4929bb0f7d2415e8b471,
title = "Detecting Voids within a Historical Building Fa{\cc}ade: A Comparative Study of Three High Frequency GPR Antenna",
abstract = "Ground penetrating radar is becoming an established component of the stone conservation researcher's arsenal. There is great potential in this quick and non-destructive technique that provides confirmation of deterioration features, such as voids, whose presence has been suggested using other tools. The past application of this technology has focused upon block scale stone deterioration, with less attention given to the study of features that extend across multiple blocks within the walls. The aim of this paper was to primarily to demonstrate the suitability of GPR for identifying void spaces when run across a rough surfaced wall fa{\cc}ade. Additionally, this work aims to aid in the application of GPR for this purpose, by providing a comparison of three commonly used antennas to inform equipment choice during survey design. For this study, three high frequency antennas, 1.2 GHz, 1.6 GHz and 2.3 GHz, were run along the same perpendicular test lines across multiple blocks within a historical building fa{\cc}ade. The resultant reflection profiles demonstrated that GPR can identify the presence of features within the blocks when run across a rough wall section. However, without the use of additional information from secondary data sources it is not possible to confirm the identity of features. The comparison of the three antennas, showed that the 1.6 GHz antenna was the least suited for this task, due to the presence of extensive ringing in the resultant reflection profiles. Alternatively, the 1.2 GHz antenna is most suitable for investigations deep within the wall and the 2.3 GHz better suits highly detailed analysis of features present within the near surface material. The choice of the most appropriate antenna depends upon the nature of the task it will be deployed for.",
keywords = "Ground Penetrating Radar, Urban Weathering, Sandstone, Non Destructive Survey, Frequency comparison, Reflection Profiles",
author = "Brian Johnston and Alastair Ruffell and Jennifer McKinley and Patricia Warke",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.culher.2018.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "117--123",
journal = "Journal of Cultural Heritage",
issn = "1296-2074",
publisher = "Elsevier Masson",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting Voids within a Historical Building Façade: A Comparative Study of Three High Frequency GPR Antenna

AU - Johnston, Brian

AU - Ruffell, Alastair

AU - McKinley, Jennifer

AU - Warke, Patricia

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Ground penetrating radar is becoming an established component of the stone conservation researcher's arsenal. There is great potential in this quick and non-destructive technique that provides confirmation of deterioration features, such as voids, whose presence has been suggested using other tools. The past application of this technology has focused upon block scale stone deterioration, with less attention given to the study of features that extend across multiple blocks within the walls. The aim of this paper was to primarily to demonstrate the suitability of GPR for identifying void spaces when run across a rough surfaced wall façade. Additionally, this work aims to aid in the application of GPR for this purpose, by providing a comparison of three commonly used antennas to inform equipment choice during survey design. For this study, three high frequency antennas, 1.2 GHz, 1.6 GHz and 2.3 GHz, were run along the same perpendicular test lines across multiple blocks within a historical building façade. The resultant reflection profiles demonstrated that GPR can identify the presence of features within the blocks when run across a rough wall section. However, without the use of additional information from secondary data sources it is not possible to confirm the identity of features. The comparison of the three antennas, showed that the 1.6 GHz antenna was the least suited for this task, due to the presence of extensive ringing in the resultant reflection profiles. Alternatively, the 1.2 GHz antenna is most suitable for investigations deep within the wall and the 2.3 GHz better suits highly detailed analysis of features present within the near surface material. The choice of the most appropriate antenna depends upon the nature of the task it will be deployed for.

AB - Ground penetrating radar is becoming an established component of the stone conservation researcher's arsenal. There is great potential in this quick and non-destructive technique that provides confirmation of deterioration features, such as voids, whose presence has been suggested using other tools. The past application of this technology has focused upon block scale stone deterioration, with less attention given to the study of features that extend across multiple blocks within the walls. The aim of this paper was to primarily to demonstrate the suitability of GPR for identifying void spaces when run across a rough surfaced wall façade. Additionally, this work aims to aid in the application of GPR for this purpose, by providing a comparison of three commonly used antennas to inform equipment choice during survey design. For this study, three high frequency antennas, 1.2 GHz, 1.6 GHz and 2.3 GHz, were run along the same perpendicular test lines across multiple blocks within a historical building façade. The resultant reflection profiles demonstrated that GPR can identify the presence of features within the blocks when run across a rough wall section. However, without the use of additional information from secondary data sources it is not possible to confirm the identity of features. The comparison of the three antennas, showed that the 1.6 GHz antenna was the least suited for this task, due to the presence of extensive ringing in the resultant reflection profiles. Alternatively, the 1.2 GHz antenna is most suitable for investigations deep within the wall and the 2.3 GHz better suits highly detailed analysis of features present within the near surface material. The choice of the most appropriate antenna depends upon the nature of the task it will be deployed for.

KW - Ground Penetrating Radar

KW - Urban Weathering

KW - Sandstone

KW - Non Destructive Survey

KW - Frequency comparison

KW - Reflection Profiles

U2 - 10.1016/j.culher.2018.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.culher.2018.02.003

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 117

EP - 123

JO - Journal of Cultural Heritage

JF - Journal of Cultural Heritage

SN - 1296-2074

ER -