Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions

Peter W Rose, Willie Hamilton, Kate Aldersey, Andriana Barisic, Martin Dawes, Catherine Foot, Eva Grunfeld, Nigel Hart, Richard D Neal, Marie Pirotta, Jeffrey Sisler, Hans Thulesius, Peter Vedsted, Jane Young, Greg Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
158 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract


Background
Survival rates following a diagnosis of cancer vary between countries. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), a collaboration between six countries with primary care led health services, was set up in 2009 to investigate the causes of these differences. Module 3 of this collaboration hypothesised that an association exists between the readiness of primary care physicians (PCP) to investigate for cancer – the ‘threshold’ risk level at which they investigate or refer to a specialist for consideration of possible cancer – and survival for that cancer (lung, colorectal and ovarian). We describe the development of an international survey instrument to test this hypothesis.

Methods
The work was led by an academic steering group in England. They agreed that an online survey was the most pragmatic way of identifying differences between the jurisdictions. Research questions were identified through clinical experience and expert knowledge of the relevant literature.

A survey comprising a set of direct questions and five clinical scenarios was developed to investigate the hypothesis. The survey content was discussed and refined concurrently and repeatedly with international partners. The survey was validated using an iterative process in England. Following validation the survey was adapted to be relevant to the health systems operating in other jurisdictions and translated into Danish, Norwegian and Swedish, and into Canadian and Australian English.

Results
This work has produced a survey with face, content and cross cultural validity that will be circulated in all six countries. It could also form a benchmark for similar surveys in countries with similar health care systems.

Conclusions
The vignettes could also be used as educational resources. This study is likely to impact on healthcare policy and practice in participating countries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122
JournalBMC Family Practice
Volume15
Issue number1
Early online date17 Jun 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a survey instrument to investigate the primary care factors related to differences in cancer diagnosis between international jurisdictions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this