TY - GEN
T1 - Differential evolution for optimizing parameter estimation in practical D2D channels
AU - Ferreira Gomes, Samuel B.
AU - Simmons, Nidhi
AU - Yacoub, Michel Daoud
AU - Sofotasios, Paschalis C.
AU - Cotton, Simon L.
PY - 2024/7/3
Y1 - 2024/7/3
N2 - Inspired by the theory of natural evolution, Differential Evolution (DE) functions constitute an optimization tool in the field of evolutionary algorithms. Here, we propose employing DE to estimate physically acceptable fading parameters in device-to-device (D2D) communication channels. We examine four real-world D2D propagation channel measurements obtained under various conditions: indoor, outdoor, line-of-sight (LOS), and non-LOS. Four popular fading models, κ-μ, η-μ, κ-μ /inverse gamma, and η-μ /inverse gamma are used to characterize these links. Two fitness functions, Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) and mean squared error (MSE), are utilized for evaluation. We also compare the DE with another evolutionary algorithm, namely the genetic algorithm (GA). Notably, our results demonstrate that while both algorithms deliver excellent estimation performances, DE emerges as significantly faster and more robust compared to GA. Regarding fitness performances, the algorithm, when paired with KLD, outperforms the pairing with MSE, as assessed through the minimization of the Akaike information criterion.
AB - Inspired by the theory of natural evolution, Differential Evolution (DE) functions constitute an optimization tool in the field of evolutionary algorithms. Here, we propose employing DE to estimate physically acceptable fading parameters in device-to-device (D2D) communication channels. We examine four real-world D2D propagation channel measurements obtained under various conditions: indoor, outdoor, line-of-sight (LOS), and non-LOS. Four popular fading models, κ-μ, η-μ, κ-μ /inverse gamma, and η-μ /inverse gamma are used to characterize these links. Two fitness functions, Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) and mean squared error (MSE), are utilized for evaluation. We also compare the DE with another evolutionary algorithm, namely the genetic algorithm (GA). Notably, our results demonstrate that while both algorithms deliver excellent estimation performances, DE emerges as significantly faster and more robust compared to GA. Regarding fitness performances, the algorithm, when paired with KLD, outperforms the pairing with MSE, as assessed through the minimization of the Akaike information criterion.
KW - differential evolution
KW - optimizing parameter estimation
KW - practical D2D
U2 - 10.1109/WCNC57260.2024.10570971
DO - 10.1109/WCNC57260.2024.10570971
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85198843619
SN - 9798350303599
T3 - IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC
BT - IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC 2024): proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 25th IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 2024
Y2 - 21 April 2024 through 24 April 2024
ER -