Do judges prefer independent or dependent advice? Investigating the roles of advisor accuracy and advisor consensus

Stefan Schulz-Hardt; Stella K. Wanzel; Johannes Rollwage; Thomas Schultze

Do judges prefer independent or dependent advice? Investigating the roles of advisor accuracy and advisor consensus

Stefan Schulz-Hardt, Stella K. Wanzel, Johannes Rollwage, Thomas Schultze

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

In altogether six experiments using the „judge-advisor-paradigm“, we show that judges weight interdependent advice (i.e. advisors with correlated errors) more strongly than independent advice, even if the latter is more accurate. In contrast, they actively select the type of advice that is more accurate in a given situation.

Original language	English
Publication status	Published - 20 Jul 2019
Externally published	Yes
Event	14th Annual INGRoup Conference 2019 - Lisbon, Portugal Duration: 18 Jul 2019 → 20 Jul 2019 https://www.ingroup.net/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=300815&module_id=538618

Conference

Conference	14th Annual INGRoup Conference 2019
Country/Territory	Portugal
City	Lisbon
Period	18/07/2019 → 20/07/2019
Internet address	https://www.ingroup.net/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=300815&module_id=538618

Cite this

@conference{757720eefe6c434c982b5e58a9ea7726,

title = "Do judges prefer independent or dependent advice? Investigating the roles of advisor accuracy and advisor consensus",

abstract = "In altogether six experiments using the „judge-advisor-paradigm“, we show that judges weight interdependent advice (i.e. advisors with correlated errors) more strongly than independent advice, even if the latter is more accurate. In contrast, they actively select the type of advice that is more accurate in a given situation.",

author = "Stefan Schulz-Hardt and Wanzel, {Stella K.} and Johannes Rollwage and Thomas Schultze",

year = "2019",

month = jul,

day = "20",

language = "English",

note = "14th Annual INGRoup Conference 2019 ; Conference date: 18-07-2019 Through 20-07-2019",

url = "https://www.ingroup.net/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=300815&module_id=538618",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Do judges prefer independent or dependent advice? Investigating the roles of advisor accuracy and advisor consensus

AU - Schulz-Hardt, Stefan

AU - Wanzel, Stella K.

AU - Rollwage, Johannes

AU - Schultze, Thomas

PY - 2019/7/20

Y1 - 2019/7/20

N2 - In altogether six experiments using the „judge-advisor-paradigm“, we show that judges weight interdependent advice (i.e. advisors with correlated errors) more strongly than independent advice, even if the latter is more accurate. In contrast, they actively select the type of advice that is more accurate in a given situation.

AB - In altogether six experiments using the „judge-advisor-paradigm“, we show that judges weight interdependent advice (i.e. advisors with correlated errors) more strongly than independent advice, even if the latter is more accurate. In contrast, they actively select the type of advice that is more accurate in a given situation.

M3 - Paper

T2 - 14th Annual INGRoup Conference 2019

Y2 - 18 July 2019 through 20 July 2019

ER -

Do judges prefer independent or dependent advice? Investigating the roles of advisor accuracy and advisor consensus

Abstract

Conference

Fingerprint

Cite this