Abstract
While the literature on tactical voting suggests third parties are not likely to form under first-past-the-post rules, the literature also provides several potential explanations for why third parties have flourished in several first-past-the-post systems, and why voters will support these parties. This research note examines the most popular of these explanations, which holds that voters supporting parties placing third or worse in their district fail to recognize their party is out of the running. Using Canadian Election Study data from three recent elections, the results show that most voters supporting parties placing third or worse in their districts recognize that their parties are not likely to finish first or second. These results suggest more attention should be paid to other potential explanations for third-party voting in first-past-the-post systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Research & Politics |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 Sep 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- first-past-the-post systems
- Tactical voting
- third parties
Cite this
}
Do third-party supporters recognize their party is out of the running? Evidence from Canada. / Raymond, Christopher D.
In: Research & Politics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 12.09.2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Do third-party supporters recognize their party is out of the running? Evidence from Canada
AU - Raymond, Christopher D.
PY - 2018/9/12
Y1 - 2018/9/12
N2 - While the literature on tactical voting suggests third parties are not likely to form under first-past-the-post rules, the literature also provides several potential explanations for why third parties have flourished in several first-past-the-post systems, and why voters will support these parties. This research note examines the most popular of these explanations, which holds that voters supporting parties placing third or worse in their district fail to recognize their party is out of the running. Using Canadian Election Study data from three recent elections, the results show that most voters supporting parties placing third or worse in their districts recognize that their parties are not likely to finish first or second. These results suggest more attention should be paid to other potential explanations for third-party voting in first-past-the-post systems.
AB - While the literature on tactical voting suggests third parties are not likely to form under first-past-the-post rules, the literature also provides several potential explanations for why third parties have flourished in several first-past-the-post systems, and why voters will support these parties. This research note examines the most popular of these explanations, which holds that voters supporting parties placing third or worse in their district fail to recognize their party is out of the running. Using Canadian Election Study data from three recent elections, the results show that most voters supporting parties placing third or worse in their districts recognize that their parties are not likely to finish first or second. These results suggest more attention should be paid to other potential explanations for third-party voting in first-past-the-post systems.
KW - first-past-the-post systems
KW - Tactical voting
KW - third parties
U2 - 10.1177/2053168018797866
DO - 10.1177/2053168018797866
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053916349
VL - 5
JO - Research & Politics
JF - Research & Politics
SN - 2053-1680
IS - 3
ER -