Docetaxel for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes in the STAMPEDE Randomized Controlled Trial

Nicholas D James, Fiona C Ingleby, Noel W Clarke, Claire L Amos, Gerhardt Attard, Christopher D Brawley, Simon Chowdhury, William Cross, David P Dearnaley, Duncan C Gilbert, Silke Gillessen, Robert J Jones, Ruth E Langley, Archie Macnair, Zafar I Malik, Malcolm D Mason, David J Matheson, Robin Millman, Chris C Parker, Hannah L RushJ Martin Russell, Carly Au, Alastair W S Ritchie, Ricardo Pereira Mestre, Imtiaz Ahmed, Alison J Birtle, Susannah J Brock, Prantik Das, Victoria A Ford, Emma K Gray, Robert J Hughes, Caroline B Manetta, Duncan B McLaren, Ashok D Nikapota, Joe M O'Sullivan, Carla Perna, Clive Peedell, Andrew S Protheroe, Santhanam Sundar, Jacob S Tanguay, Shaun P Tolan, John Wagstaff, Jan B Wallace, James P Wylie, Anjali Zarkar, Mahesh K B Parmar, Matthew R Sydes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
88 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
STAMPEDE previously reported adding upfront docetaxel improved overall survival for prostate cancer patients starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy. We report long-term results for non-metastatic patients using, as primary outcome, metastatic progression-free survival (mPFS), an externally demonstrated surrogate for overall survival.

Methods
Standard of care (SOC) was androgen deprivation therapy with or without radical prostate radiotherapy. A total of 460 SOC and 230 SOC plus docetaxel were randomly assigned 2:1. Standard survival methods and intention to treat were used. Treatment effect estimates were summarized from adjusted Cox regression models, switching to restricted mean survival time if non-proportional hazards. mPFS (new metastases, skeletal-related events, or prostate cancer death) had 70% power (α = 0.05) for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70. Secondary outcome measures included overall survival, failure-free survival (FFS), and progression-free survival (PFS: mPFS, locoregional progression).

Results
Median follow-up was 6.5 years with 142 mPFS events on SOC (3 year and 54% increases over previous report). There was no good evidence of an advantage to SOC plus docetaxel on mPFS (HR = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 1.19; P = .43); with 5-year mPFS 82% (95% CI = 78% to 87%) SOC plus docetaxel vs 77% (95% CI = 73% to 81%) SOC. Secondary outcomes showed evidence SOC plus docetaxel improved FFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.88; P = .002) and PFS (nonproportional P = .03, restricted mean survival time difference = 5.8 months, 95% CI = 0.5 to 11.2; P = .03) but no good evidence of overall survival benefit (125 SOC deaths; HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.64 to 1.21; P = .44). There was no evidence SOC plus docetaxel increased late toxicity: post 1 year, 29% SOC and 30% SOC plus docetaxel grade 3-5 toxicity.

Conclusions
There is robust evidence that SOC plus docetaxel improved FFS and PFS (previously shown to increase quality-adjusted life-years), without excess late toxicity, which did not translate into benefit for longer-term outcomes. This may influence patient management in individual cases.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberpkac043
JournalJNCI Cancer Spectrum
Volume6
Issue number4
Early online date25 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press.

Keywords

  • Docetaxel - therapeutic use
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy
  • Androgens

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Docetaxel for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes in the STAMPEDE Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this