Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does competitive action intensity influence team performance via leader bottom-line mentality? A social information processing perspective

  • Shuang Ren*
  • , Mary B. Mawritz
  • , Rebecca L. Greenbaum
  • , Mayowa T. Babalola
  • , Zhining Wang
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

424 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Leader bottom-line mentality (LBLM) exists when leaders solely focus on securing bottom-line outcomes to the exclusion of alternative considerations. Our research examines why leaders adopt LBLMs and the implications of this focused leadership strategy on team sales performance and pro-environmental behavior. Utilizing social information processing theory, we examine LBLM as a mediator and contend that competitive action intensity in the work environment provokes LBLM, which then signals to teams the importance of raising sales performance and reducing pro-environmental behavior. We also suggest that leader performance reward expectancy (i.e., perceptions that rewards are directly tied to high performance) serves as a first-stage moderator and team performance reward expectancy serves as a second-stage moderator, with higher (vs. lower) levels of each strengthening the indirect effects of competitive action intensity, through LBLM, onto team sales performance and pro-environmental behavior. Utilizing field data from a large pharmaceutical company (Study 1) as well as an experimental causal chain design (Studies 2a and 2b), we found support for our theoretical model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)811–828
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume109
Issue number6
Early online date25 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • competitive action
  • team performance
  • mentality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does competitive action intensity influence team performance via leader bottom-line mentality? A social information processing perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this