In this paper, I evaluate the teleologies of Donald Crosby and Thomas Nagel. It is argued that Crosby's emergentist teleology suffers from severe philosophical problems. I argue instead in favour of Nagel's fundamental teleology, which carries significant philosophical benefits.
|Number of pages||19|
|Journal||American Journal of Theology and Philosophy|
|Early online date||01 Jan 2019|
|Publication status||Published - 15 May 2019|
- Thomas Nagel
- Donald Crosby