Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity

Viviane Gravey, Andrew Jordan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)
608 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The financial crisis has triggered demands to halt and even reverse the expansion of European Union (EU) policies. But have these and previous demands actually resulted in policy dismantling? The existing literature has charted the rise of dismantling discourses such as subsidiarity and better regulation, but has not examined the net effect on the acquis. For the first time, this contribution addresses this gap in the literature through an empirical study of policy change between 1992 and 2014. It is guided by a coding framework which captures the direction of policy change. It reveals that, despite its disposition towards consensualism, the EU has become a new locus of policy dismantling. However, not all policies targeted have been cut; many have stayed the same and some have even expanded. It concludes by identifying new directions for research on a topic that has continually fallen into the analytical blind spot of EU scholars.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1180-1198
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

dismantling
subsidiarity
disposition
financial crisis
coding
regulation
discourse
literature

Keywords

  • ENVIRONMENT
  • European Union
  • POLICY

Cite this

@article{5f8cc192ce92434a8736f318c98e09db,
title = "Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity",
abstract = "The financial crisis has triggered demands to halt and even reverse the expansion of European Union (EU) policies. But have these and previous demands actually resulted in policy dismantling? The existing literature has charted the rise of dismantling discourses such as subsidiarity and better regulation, but has not examined the net effect on the acquis. For the first time, this contribution addresses this gap in the literature through an empirical study of policy change between 1992 and 2014. It is guided by a coding framework which captures the direction of policy change. It reveals that, despite its disposition towards consensualism, the EU has become a new locus of policy dismantling. However, not all policies targeted have been cut; many have stayed the same and some have even expanded. It concludes by identifying new directions for research on a topic that has continually fallen into the analytical blind spot of EU scholars.",
keywords = "ENVIRONMENT, European Union, POLICY",
author = "Viviane Gravey and Andrew Jordan",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2016.1186208",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1180--1198",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity. / Gravey, Viviane; Jordan, Andrew.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 23, No. 8, 17.06.2016, p. 1180-1198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity

AU - Gravey, Viviane

AU - Jordan, Andrew

PY - 2016/6/17

Y1 - 2016/6/17

N2 - The financial crisis has triggered demands to halt and even reverse the expansion of European Union (EU) policies. But have these and previous demands actually resulted in policy dismantling? The existing literature has charted the rise of dismantling discourses such as subsidiarity and better regulation, but has not examined the net effect on the acquis. For the first time, this contribution addresses this gap in the literature through an empirical study of policy change between 1992 and 2014. It is guided by a coding framework which captures the direction of policy change. It reveals that, despite its disposition towards consensualism, the EU has become a new locus of policy dismantling. However, not all policies targeted have been cut; many have stayed the same and some have even expanded. It concludes by identifying new directions for research on a topic that has continually fallen into the analytical blind spot of EU scholars.

AB - The financial crisis has triggered demands to halt and even reverse the expansion of European Union (EU) policies. But have these and previous demands actually resulted in policy dismantling? The existing literature has charted the rise of dismantling discourses such as subsidiarity and better regulation, but has not examined the net effect on the acquis. For the first time, this contribution addresses this gap in the literature through an empirical study of policy change between 1992 and 2014. It is guided by a coding framework which captures the direction of policy change. It reveals that, despite its disposition towards consensualism, the EU has become a new locus of policy dismantling. However, not all policies targeted have been cut; many have stayed the same and some have even expanded. It concludes by identifying new directions for research on a topic that has continually fallen into the analytical blind spot of EU scholars.

KW - ENVIRONMENT

KW - European Union

KW - POLICY

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2016.1186208

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2016.1186208

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1180

EP - 1198

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 8

ER -