Downscaled GRACE/GRACE-FO observations for spatial and temporal monitoring of groundwater storage variations at the local scale using machine learning

Shoaib Ali, Jiangjun Ran*, Behnam Khorrami, Haotian Wu, Aqil Tariq, Muhammad Jehanzaib, Muhammad Mohsin Khan, Muhammad Faisal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Groundwater utilization for several purposes such as irrigation in agriculture, industry, and domestic use substantially impacts water storage. Groundwater Storage Anomaly (GWSA) estimates have improved owing to the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE-Follow On (GRACE-FO) advancements. However, the characterization of GWSA fluctuation hotspots has been hindered by the coarse resolution of GRACE data. To better measure groundwater storage and depletion variations throughout an area and identify GWSA variation hotspots, a fine spatial resolution of GWSA estimations is required. Therefore, due to the coarse resolution of GRACE measurements, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was developed to simulate fine resolution 0.1° GWSA combining climatic variables (soil moisture storage, evapotranspiration, temperature, surface runoff, and rainfall) from improved spatial high resolution FLDAS (Famine Early Warning Systems Network Land Data Assimilation System) model derived data and geospatial variables (elevation, slope, and aspect) extracted from Digital Elevation Model (DEM). A correlation of 0.98 demonstrated that the XGBoost model successfully simulated groundwater storage at a finer scale over the Upper Indus Plain Aquifer (UIPA). The findings suggested that the UIPA's groundwater storage has been depleted at an annual rate of 0.44 km3/yr which was 7.94 km3 in total between 2003 and 2020. According to the results, there seems to be consistency between the downscaled and original GWSA regarding temporal and spatial variability. The results were verified to show an improved correlation of 0.77 between the downscaled and the in-situ GWSA, compared to 0.75 between the GRACE-derived and the in-situ GWSA.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101100
JournalGroundwater for Sustainable Development
Volume25
Early online date29 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 42174096 ) for their support. The authors appreciate the constructive feedback from the editor, associate editor, and two reviewers. The FLDAS data used in this study are acquired as part of the mission of NASA's Earth Science Division and archived and distributed by the Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center (DISC).

Funding Information:
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42174096) for their support. The authors appreciate the constructive feedback from the editor, associate editor, and two reviewers. The FLDAS data used in this study are acquired as part of the mission of NASA's Earth Science Division and archived and distributed by the Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center (DISC).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

  • Downscaling
  • GRACE
  • Groundwater depletion
  • GWSA
  • Machine learning
  • TWSA
  • UIPA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Water Science and Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Downscaled GRACE/GRACE-FO observations for spatial and temporal monitoring of groundwater storage variations at the local scale using machine learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this