Effects of laser polarization on responses of the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator X-Rhod-1 in neurons and myelin

Ileana Micu, Craig Brideau, Lu Li, Peter K. Stys

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)


    Laser-scanning optical microscopes generally do not control the polarization of the exciting laser field. We show that laser polarization and imaging mode (confocal versus two photon) exert a profound influence on the ability to detect Ca 2 + changes in both cultured neurons and living myelin. With two-photon excitation, increasing ellipticity resulted in a ≈ 50 % reduction in resting X-Rhod-1 fluorescence in homogeneous bulk solution, cell cytoplasm, and myelin. In contrast, varying the angle of a linearly polarized laser field only had appreciable effects on dyes that partitioned into myelin in an ordered manner. During injury-induced Ca 2 + increases, larger ellipticities resulted in a significantly greater injury-induced signal increase in neurons, and particularly in myelin. Indeed, the traditional method of measuring Ca 2 + changes using one-photon confocal mode with linearly polarized continuous wave laser illumination produced no appreciable X-Rhod-1 signal increase in ischemic myelin, compared to a robust ≈ 50 % fluorescence increase with two-photon excitation and optimized ellipticity with the identical injury paradigm. This underscores the differences in one- versus two-photon excitation and, in particular, the under-appreciated effects of laser polarization on the behavior of certain Ca 2 + reporters, which may lead to substantial underestimates of the real Ca 2 + fluctuations in various cellular compartments.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number 28612034
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 05 Jun 2017


    • Myelin
    • polarization
    • multi-photon microscopy


    Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of laser polarization on responses of the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator X-Rhod-1 in neurons and myelin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this