Effects of the availability of accurate proprioceptive information on older adults’ postural sway and muscle co-contraction

Chesney E. Craig, Glenn H. M. Calvert, Michail Doumas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
104 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

During conditions of increased postural instability, older adults exhibit greater lower-limb muscle co- contraction. This response has been interpreted as a compensatory postural strategy, which may be used to i006Ecrease proprioceptive information from muscle spindles or to stiffen the lower limb as a general response to minimise postural sway. The current study aimed to test these two hypotheses by investigating use of muscle co-contraction during sensory transitions that manipulated proprioceptive input. Surface EMG was recorded from the bilateral tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis muscles, in young (aged 18-30) and older adults (aged 68-80) during blind- folded postural assessment. This commenced on a fixed platform (baseline: 2mins), followed by 3- minutes on a sway-referenced platform (adaptation) and a final 3-minutes on a fixed platform again (reintegration). Sensory reweighting was slower in older adults, as shown by a significantly larger and longer postural sway aftereffect once a stable platform was restored. Muscle co-contraction showed similar aftereffects, whereby older adults showed a larger increase in co-contraction once the stable platform had been restored, compared to young adults. This co-contraction aftereffect did not return to baseline until after 1 minute. Our evidence for high muscle co-contraction during the reintroduction of veridical proprioceptive input suggests that increased co-contraction in older adults is not dependent on contemporaneous proprioceptive input. Rather, it is more likely that co- contraction is a general postural strategy used to minimize postural sway, which is increased during this sensory transition. Future research should examine whether muscle co-contraction is typically a reactive or anticipatory response.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2548-2556
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Neuroscience
Volume46
Issue number10
Early online date05 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 05 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Muscle Contraction
Lower Extremity
Muscle Spindles
Young Adult
Skeletal Muscle

Cite this

@article{9bc1048edc1d477188598f5118699e9b,
title = "Effects of the availability of accurate proprioceptive information on older adults’ postural sway and muscle co-contraction",
abstract = "During conditions of increased postural instability, older adults exhibit greater lower-limb muscle co- contraction. This response has been interpreted as a compensatory postural strategy, which may be used to i006Ecrease proprioceptive information from muscle spindles or to stiffen the lower limb as a general response to minimise postural sway. The current study aimed to test these two hypotheses by investigating use of muscle co-contraction during sensory transitions that manipulated proprioceptive input. Surface EMG was recorded from the bilateral tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis muscles, in young (aged 18-30) and older adults (aged 68-80) during blind- folded postural assessment. This commenced on a fixed platform (baseline: 2mins), followed by 3- minutes on a sway-referenced platform (adaptation) and a final 3-minutes on a fixed platform again (reintegration). Sensory reweighting was slower in older adults, as shown by a significantly larger and longer postural sway aftereffect once a stable platform was restored. Muscle co-contraction showed similar aftereffects, whereby older adults showed a larger increase in co-contraction once the stable platform had been restored, compared to young adults. This co-contraction aftereffect did not return to baseline until after 1 minute. Our evidence for high muscle co-contraction during the reintroduction of veridical proprioceptive input suggests that increased co-contraction in older adults is not dependent on contemporaneous proprioceptive input. Rather, it is more likely that co- contraction is a general postural strategy used to minimize postural sway, which is increased during this sensory transition. Future research should examine whether muscle co-contraction is typically a reactive or anticipatory response.",
author = "Craig, {Chesney E.} and Calvert, {Glenn H. M.} and Michail Doumas",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1111/ejn.13703",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "2548--2556",
journal = "The European journal of neuroscience",
issn = "0953-816X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

Effects of the availability of accurate proprioceptive information on older adults’ postural sway and muscle co-contraction. / Craig, Chesney E.; Calvert, Glenn H. M.; Doumas, Michail.

In: European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 46, No. 10, 05.10.2017, p. 2548-2556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of the availability of accurate proprioceptive information on older adults’ postural sway and muscle co-contraction

AU - Craig, Chesney E.

AU - Calvert, Glenn H. M.

AU - Doumas, Michail

PY - 2017/10/5

Y1 - 2017/10/5

N2 - During conditions of increased postural instability, older adults exhibit greater lower-limb muscle co- contraction. This response has been interpreted as a compensatory postural strategy, which may be used to i006Ecrease proprioceptive information from muscle spindles or to stiffen the lower limb as a general response to minimise postural sway. The current study aimed to test these two hypotheses by investigating use of muscle co-contraction during sensory transitions that manipulated proprioceptive input. Surface EMG was recorded from the bilateral tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis muscles, in young (aged 18-30) and older adults (aged 68-80) during blind- folded postural assessment. This commenced on a fixed platform (baseline: 2mins), followed by 3- minutes on a sway-referenced platform (adaptation) and a final 3-minutes on a fixed platform again (reintegration). Sensory reweighting was slower in older adults, as shown by a significantly larger and longer postural sway aftereffect once a stable platform was restored. Muscle co-contraction showed similar aftereffects, whereby older adults showed a larger increase in co-contraction once the stable platform had been restored, compared to young adults. This co-contraction aftereffect did not return to baseline until after 1 minute. Our evidence for high muscle co-contraction during the reintroduction of veridical proprioceptive input suggests that increased co-contraction in older adults is not dependent on contemporaneous proprioceptive input. Rather, it is more likely that co- contraction is a general postural strategy used to minimize postural sway, which is increased during this sensory transition. Future research should examine whether muscle co-contraction is typically a reactive or anticipatory response.

AB - During conditions of increased postural instability, older adults exhibit greater lower-limb muscle co- contraction. This response has been interpreted as a compensatory postural strategy, which may be used to i006Ecrease proprioceptive information from muscle spindles or to stiffen the lower limb as a general response to minimise postural sway. The current study aimed to test these two hypotheses by investigating use of muscle co-contraction during sensory transitions that manipulated proprioceptive input. Surface EMG was recorded from the bilateral tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis muscles, in young (aged 18-30) and older adults (aged 68-80) during blind- folded postural assessment. This commenced on a fixed platform (baseline: 2mins), followed by 3- minutes on a sway-referenced platform (adaptation) and a final 3-minutes on a fixed platform again (reintegration). Sensory reweighting was slower in older adults, as shown by a significantly larger and longer postural sway aftereffect once a stable platform was restored. Muscle co-contraction showed similar aftereffects, whereby older adults showed a larger increase in co-contraction once the stable platform had been restored, compared to young adults. This co-contraction aftereffect did not return to baseline until after 1 minute. Our evidence for high muscle co-contraction during the reintroduction of veridical proprioceptive input suggests that increased co-contraction in older adults is not dependent on contemporaneous proprioceptive input. Rather, it is more likely that co- contraction is a general postural strategy used to minimize postural sway, which is increased during this sensory transition. Future research should examine whether muscle co-contraction is typically a reactive or anticipatory response.

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.13703/abstract

U2 - 10.1111/ejn.13703

DO - 10.1111/ejn.13703

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 2548

EP - 2556

JO - The European journal of neuroscience

JF - The European journal of neuroscience

SN - 0953-816X

IS - 10

ER -