Electoral administration and state-of-the-art AI: a cocktail of incongruences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly spreading into various avenues of human activity. This article considers the suitability of state-of-the-art AI for use within the sector of electoral administration, which comprises processes critical to the sustainment of healthy democratic institutions and procedures We posit that there are fundamental incongruences between the ways of current AI and the values and principles that electoral administration processes need to adhere to. This article explores the contours of such incongruences using specific examples of (potential) risks from AI usage within electoral administration. We outline how state-of-the-art AI has an entrenched majoritarian bias, data-first ethos, neoliberal propensity and opaque operation, all of which pose significant hurdles for usage within electoral administration. While our intent is primarily limited to conveying the nature of such incongruences to a non-technical audience, we also briefly deliberate on possible pathways towards mitigating such harm.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-130
JournalThe Fletcher Forum of World Affairs
Volume48
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 02 Oct 2024

Publications and Copyright Policy

This work is licensed under Queen’s Research Publications and Copyright Policy.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electoral administration and state-of-the-art AI: a cocktail of incongruences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this