Electrical vestibular nerve stimulation (VeNS): a follow-up safety assessment of long-term usage

Erin McCulloch, Sai Sailesh Kumar Goothy, Jason McKeown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives
This retrospective, open-label study was undertaken to assess the safety of repeated, long-term electrical vestibular nerve stimulation (VeNS). The primary outcome for this study was assessment of hearing function as reported by formal audiometry testing.

Methods
Assessments were conducted on n=25 long-term users of daily 1.5 mA VeNS. Skin inspection of the mastoid area, otoscope examination of the inner ear, and formal audiometry testing was conducted on n=18 users. All participants completed a survey-based assessment to determine usage of the device, adverse events, and long-term outcomes.

Results
Mean duration of use was 22 months, with approximately 80% of users reporting 1 h of daily, or 1 h of regular (2–3 times per week) VeNS usage. No adverse events were reported. There were no significant findings during examination of the mastoid areas, ear canal, or tympanic membranes. There were no significant findings reported from the formal audiogram assessments.

Conclusions
This appears to be the first study to provide formal assessment to show that repeated, long-term VeNS usage has not generated any significant side effects or adverse events. Results from this study further support previous literature that electrical vestibular stimulation is both safe and well-tolerated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-648
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Mar 2022

Keywords

  • neuromodulation
  • safety
  • vestibular

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Drug Discovery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electrical vestibular nerve stimulation (VeNS): a follow-up safety assessment of long-term usage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this