Research output per year
Research output per year
N. J. Hartley, J. Grenzer, L. Huang, Y. Inubushi, N. Kamimura, K. Katagiri, R. Kodama, A. Kon, W. Lu, M. Makita, T. Matsuoka, S. Nakajima, N. Ozaki, T. Pikuz, A. Rode, D. Sagae, A. K. Schuster, K. Tono, K. Voigt, J. Vorberger
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Since performing the analysis presented in this Letter, we have become aware that the values quoted for the incident x-ray pulse intensities and fluences, and hence the absorbed doses in the sample, are incorrect. These values were calculated using the fluence present in the beam as it exits the undulator, and did not account for losses in the subsequent propagation and focusing. Because of filtering and the use of Kirkpatrick-Baez mirrors to achieve a nanometer-scale focus [1,2], the transmission is just over 25%, significantly reducing the energy incident onto the target. While this erratum does not affect the scientific results obtained, the corrected values should be noted and used in any comparison between the results from this beamtime, published here and in [3], and future work.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 169901 |
Journal | Physical Review Letters |
Volume | 128 |
Issue number | 16 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 22 Apr 2022 |
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review