Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy

Florian Cova, Fiery Cushman, Paulo Sousa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

81 Citations (Scopus)


Responding to recent concerns about the reliability of the published literature in psychology and other disciplines, we formed the X-Phi Replicability Project (XRP) to estimate the reproducibility of experimental philosophy ( Drawing on a representative sample of 40 x-phi studies published between 2003 and 2015, weenlisted 20 research teams across 8 countries to conduct a high-quality replication of each study in order to compare the results to the original published findings. We found that x-phi studies – as represented in our sample – successfully replicated about 70% of the time. We discuss possible reasons for this relatively high replication rate in the field of experimental philosophy and offer suggestions for best research practices going forward.
Original languageEnglish
JournalReview of Philosophy and Psychology
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jun 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Correction to: Correction to: Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy

    Cova, F., Strickland, B., Abatista, A., Allard, A., Andow, J., Attie, M., Beebe, J., Berniūnas, R., Boudesseul, J., Colombo, M., Cushman, F., Diaz, R., N’Djaye Nikolai van Dongen, N., Dranseika, V., Earp, B. D., Torres, A. G., Hannikainen, I., Hernández-Conde, J. V., Hu, W., Jaquet, F., & 22 othersKhalifa, K., Kim, H., Kneer, M., Knobe, J., Kurthy, M., Lantian, A., Liao, S. Y., Machery, E., Moerenhout, T., Mott, C., Phelan, M., Phillips, J., Rambharose, N., Reuter, K., Romero, F., Sousa, P., Sprenger, J., Thalabard, E., Tobia, K., Viciana, H., Wilkenfeld, D. & Zhou, X., Dec 2021, In: Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 12, 4, p. 999-1003 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Cite this