Ethical framework for artificial intelligence and digital technologies

Mona Ashok*, Rohit Madan, Anton Joha, Uthayasankar Sivarajah

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

115 Citations (Scopus)
373 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Digital technologies (DT) is proliferating a profound socio-technical transformation. Governments and AI scholarship have endorsed key AI principles but lack direction at the implementation level. Through a systematic literature review of 59 papers, this paper contributes to the critical debate on the ethical use of AI in DTs beyond high-level AI principles. To our knowledge, this is the first paper that identifies 14 digital ethics implications for the use of AI in seven DT archetypes using a novel ontological framework (physical, cognitive, information, and governance). The paper presents key findings of the review and a conceptual model with twelve propositions highlighting the impact of digital ethics implications on societal impact, as moderated by DT archetypes and mediated by organisational impact. The implications of intelligibility, accountability, fairness, and autonomy (under the cognitive domain), and privacy (under the information domain) are the most widely discussed in our sample. Furthermore, ethical implications related to the governance domain are shown to be generally applicable for most DT archetypes. Implications under the physical domain are less prominent when it comes to AI diffusion with one exception (safety). The key findings and resulting conceptual model have academic and professional implications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102433
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Information Management
Volume62
Early online date05 Oct 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Feb 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical framework for artificial intelligence and digital technologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this