Abstract
This article explores alternative interpretations of the meaning and method of urban policy
evaluation within the European Union (EU) Structural Funds. Using the EU URBAN Community Initiative
Programme 1994-1999 it draws a distinction between 'instrumental' techniques that are primarily concerned
with performance and efficiency measures and 'interpretative' approaches that stress the need to explore power
relationships in the development and delivery of spending programmes. Empirically, it reflects on the
interpretation of EU guidance and the MEANS (Means for Evaluating Actions of a Structural Nature)
Collection to evaluate the Derry/Londonderry (UK) URBAN Sub-programme 1994-1999. The analysis
concludes by emphasizing the need to ensure that urban policy evaluation is consistent with the broader social
turn in the scope and content of regeneration programmes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 193-211 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | European Planning Studies |
Volume | 11(2) |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2003 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development