TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of the psychometric properties of self-reported measures of alcohol consumption: a COSMIN systematic review
AU - McKenna, Hannah
AU - Treanor, Charlene
AU - O'Reilly, Dermot
AU - Donnelly, Michael
PY - 2018/2/2
Y1 - 2018/2/2
N2 - Purpose: To review studies about the reliability and validity of self-reported alcohol
consumption measures among adults, an area which needs updating to reflect current
research.
Methods: Databases (PUBMED (1966-present), MEDLINE (1946-present), EMBASE
(1947-present), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)
(1937-present), PsycINFO (1887-present) and Social Science Citation Index (1976-
present)) were searched systematically for studies from inception to 11th August 2017.
Pairs of independent reviewers screened study titles, abstracts and full texts with high
agreement and a third author resolved disagreements. A comprehensive quality
assessment was conducted of the reported psychometric properties of measures of
alcohol consumption using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health
Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) to derive ratings of poor, fair, good or excellent
for each checklist item relating to each psychometric property.
Results: Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria and, collectively, they investigated
twenty-one short-term recall measures, fourteen quantity-frequency measures and
eleven graduated-frequency measures. All measures demonstrated adequate/good
test-retest reliability and convergent validity. Quantity-frequency measures
demonstrated adequate/good criterion validity; graduated-frequency and short-term
recall measures demonstrated adequate/good divergent validity. Quantity-frequency
measures and short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate/good hypothesis
validity; short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate construct validity.
Methodological quality varied within and between studies.
Conclusions: It was difficult to discern conclusively which measure was the most
reliable and valid given that no study assessed all psychometric properties and the
included studies varied in the psychometric properties that they selected to assess.
However, when the results from the range of studies were considered and summed,
they tended to indicate that the quantity-frequency measure compared to the other two
measures performed best in psychometric terms and, therefore, it is likely to produce
the most reliable and valid assessment of alcohol consumption in population surveys.
AB - Purpose: To review studies about the reliability and validity of self-reported alcohol
consumption measures among adults, an area which needs updating to reflect current
research.
Methods: Databases (PUBMED (1966-present), MEDLINE (1946-present), EMBASE
(1947-present), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)
(1937-present), PsycINFO (1887-present) and Social Science Citation Index (1976-
present)) were searched systematically for studies from inception to 11th August 2017.
Pairs of independent reviewers screened study titles, abstracts and full texts with high
agreement and a third author resolved disagreements. A comprehensive quality
assessment was conducted of the reported psychometric properties of measures of
alcohol consumption using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health
Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) to derive ratings of poor, fair, good or excellent
for each checklist item relating to each psychometric property.
Results: Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria and, collectively, they investigated
twenty-one short-term recall measures, fourteen quantity-frequency measures and
eleven graduated-frequency measures. All measures demonstrated adequate/good
test-retest reliability and convergent validity. Quantity-frequency measures
demonstrated adequate/good criterion validity; graduated-frequency and short-term
recall measures demonstrated adequate/good divergent validity. Quantity-frequency
measures and short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate/good hypothesis
validity; short-term recall measures demonstrated adequate construct validity.
Methodological quality varied within and between studies.
Conclusions: It was difficult to discern conclusively which measure was the most
reliable and valid given that no study assessed all psychometric properties and the
included studies varied in the psychometric properties that they selected to assess.
However, when the results from the range of studies were considered and summed,
they tended to indicate that the quantity-frequency measure compared to the other two
measures performed best in psychometric terms and, therefore, it is likely to produce
the most reliable and valid assessment of alcohol consumption in population surveys.
U2 - 10.1186/s13011-018-0143-8
DO - 10.1186/s13011-018-0143-8
M3 - Article
SN - 1747-597X
VL - 13
SP - 1
EP - 19
JO - Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
JF - Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
IS - 6
ER -