Evidence-based practice: the relevance of systematic reviews.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Aim:
To demonstrate how systematic reviews provide robust evidence to inform clinical decision making in practice.

Background
Systematic reviews collate findings from a number of research studies in order to provide a comprehensive and reliable summary of the best available evidence. The use of systematic reviews to inform practice based decisions has increased as a result of the overwhelming amount of research literature available, poor quality of research evidence and the need to ensure practice is based upon the best available evidence. Systematic reviews are an efficient way of coping with large volumes of data to answer focused research questions. They differ from traditional literature reviews as they adhere to an explicit scientific process. The use of explicit and rigorous methods to identify, appraise and synthesise relevant studies minimises bias and provides a reliable basis for decision making. As a result systematic reviews provide clear evidence on the effectiveness of a healthcare intervention to inform policy and decision making across healthcare systems. An example of how the findings from systematic reviews can provide reliable evidence to inform healthcare decisions will be provided in this presentation1. This will demonstrate how focused clinical questions can be answered by systematic reviews and translated into practice.

Reference:
1. McGaughey J, Alderdice F, Fowler R, Kapila A, Moutray M. (2007) Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards (REVIEW). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3. art no CD005529
LanguageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2015
EventBritish Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) International Conference - London , United Kingdom
Duration: 06 Sep 201508 Sep 2015

Conference

ConferenceBritish Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) International Conference
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period06/09/201508/09/2015

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Delivery of Health Care
Research
Decision Making
Patients' Rooms
Policy Making
Critical Care
Art
Critical Illness
General Hospitals
Databases

Cite this

McGaughey, J. (2015). Evidence-based practice: the relevance of systematic reviews.. Paper presented at British Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) International Conference, London , United Kingdom.
McGaughey, Jennifer. / Evidence-based practice: the relevance of systematic reviews. Paper presented at British Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) International Conference, London , United Kingdom.
@conference{4a6fdd4b8b4146da8b83d70693d2860f,
title = "Evidence-based practice: the relevance of systematic reviews.",
abstract = "Aim: To demonstrate how systematic reviews provide robust evidence to inform clinical decision making in practice. Background Systematic reviews collate findings from a number of research studies in order to provide a comprehensive and reliable summary of the best available evidence. The use of systematic reviews to inform practice based decisions has increased as a result of the overwhelming amount of research literature available, poor quality of research evidence and the need to ensure practice is based upon the best available evidence. Systematic reviews are an efficient way of coping with large volumes of data to answer focused research questions. They differ from traditional literature reviews as they adhere to an explicit scientific process. The use of explicit and rigorous methods to identify, appraise and synthesise relevant studies minimises bias and provides a reliable basis for decision making. As a result systematic reviews provide clear evidence on the effectiveness of a healthcare intervention to inform policy and decision making across healthcare systems. An example of how the findings from systematic reviews can provide reliable evidence to inform healthcare decisions will be provided in this presentation1. This will demonstrate how focused clinical questions can be answered by systematic reviews and translated into practice. Reference: 1. McGaughey J, Alderdice F, Fowler R, Kapila A, Moutray M. (2007) Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards (REVIEW). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3. art no CD005529",
author = "Jennifer McGaughey",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
language = "English",
note = "British Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) International Conference ; Conference date: 06-09-2015 Through 08-09-2015",

}

McGaughey, J 2015, 'Evidence-based practice: the relevance of systematic reviews.' Paper presented at British Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) International Conference, London , United Kingdom, 06/09/2015 - 08/09/2015, .

Evidence-based practice: the relevance of systematic reviews. / McGaughey, Jennifer.

2015. Paper presented at British Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) International Conference, London , United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Evidence-based practice: the relevance of systematic reviews.

AU - McGaughey, Jennifer

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - Aim: To demonstrate how systematic reviews provide robust evidence to inform clinical decision making in practice. Background Systematic reviews collate findings from a number of research studies in order to provide a comprehensive and reliable summary of the best available evidence. The use of systematic reviews to inform practice based decisions has increased as a result of the overwhelming amount of research literature available, poor quality of research evidence and the need to ensure practice is based upon the best available evidence. Systematic reviews are an efficient way of coping with large volumes of data to answer focused research questions. They differ from traditional literature reviews as they adhere to an explicit scientific process. The use of explicit and rigorous methods to identify, appraise and synthesise relevant studies minimises bias and provides a reliable basis for decision making. As a result systematic reviews provide clear evidence on the effectiveness of a healthcare intervention to inform policy and decision making across healthcare systems. An example of how the findings from systematic reviews can provide reliable evidence to inform healthcare decisions will be provided in this presentation1. This will demonstrate how focused clinical questions can be answered by systematic reviews and translated into practice. Reference: 1. McGaughey J, Alderdice F, Fowler R, Kapila A, Moutray M. (2007) Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards (REVIEW). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3. art no CD005529

AB - Aim: To demonstrate how systematic reviews provide robust evidence to inform clinical decision making in practice. Background Systematic reviews collate findings from a number of research studies in order to provide a comprehensive and reliable summary of the best available evidence. The use of systematic reviews to inform practice based decisions has increased as a result of the overwhelming amount of research literature available, poor quality of research evidence and the need to ensure practice is based upon the best available evidence. Systematic reviews are an efficient way of coping with large volumes of data to answer focused research questions. They differ from traditional literature reviews as they adhere to an explicit scientific process. The use of explicit and rigorous methods to identify, appraise and synthesise relevant studies minimises bias and provides a reliable basis for decision making. As a result systematic reviews provide clear evidence on the effectiveness of a healthcare intervention to inform policy and decision making across healthcare systems. An example of how the findings from systematic reviews can provide reliable evidence to inform healthcare decisions will be provided in this presentation1. This will demonstrate how focused clinical questions can be answered by systematic reviews and translated into practice. Reference: 1. McGaughey J, Alderdice F, Fowler R, Kapila A, Moutray M. (2007) Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of Intensive Care admission admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards (REVIEW). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3. art no CD005529

M3 - Paper

ER -

McGaughey J. Evidence-based practice: the relevance of systematic reviews.. 2015. Paper presented at British Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) International Conference, London , United Kingdom.