TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental auction confirmation that social desirability bias does not predict willingness to pay for eco-labeled goods
AU - Higgins, Kieran
AU - Longo, Alberto
AU - Hutchinson, W George
PY - 2021/12/10
Y1 - 2021/12/10
N2 - It is often assumed that consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for eco-labeled products in research settings is not because of a desire for environmental protection, but rather that they are socially compelled to make decisions that reflects favorably on them, limiting the validity of findings. Using a second-price Vickrey experimental auction, this study found higher WTP for an eco-labeled product than a comparable good, but that social desirability bias, measured by the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale, was not a significant predictor of WTP. Instead, environmental consciousness, environmental knowledge, education, and available information were stronger predictors of WTP for eco-labeled goods.
AB - It is often assumed that consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for eco-labeled products in research settings is not because of a desire for environmental protection, but rather that they are socially compelled to make decisions that reflects favorably on them, limiting the validity of findings. Using a second-price Vickrey experimental auction, this study found higher WTP for an eco-labeled product than a comparable good, but that social desirability bias, measured by the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale, was not a significant predictor of WTP. Instead, environmental consciousness, environmental knowledge, education, and available information were stronger predictors of WTP for eco-labeled goods.
U2 - 10.1017/exp.2021.24
DO - 10.1017/exp.2021.24
M3 - Article
SN - 2516-712X
JO - Experimental Results
JF - Experimental Results
ER -