Explaining the relationship between ingroup identification and intergroup bias following recategorization: A self-regulation theory analysis

Rhiannon N. Turner, Richard J. Crisp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
785 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that regulation of discrepancies between perceived actual and ideal differentiation between the ingroup and outgroup could help to explain the relationship between ingroup identification and intergroup bias when participants are recategorized into a superordinate group. Replicating previous findings, we found that following recategorization, identification was positively related to intergroup bias. No such differences emerged in a control condition. However, we also, in the recategorization condition only, observed a positive association between ingroup identification and the perceived discrepancy between actual and ideal degree of differentiation from the outgroup: at higher levels of identification, participants increasingly perceived the ingroup to be less differentiated from the outgroup than they would ideally like. This tendency mediated the relationship between identification and bias. We discuss the theoretical, methodological and practical implications of these findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-261
Number of pages11
JournalGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Communication
  • Cultural Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining the relationship between ingroup identification and intergroup bias following recategorization: A self-regulation theory analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this