Exploring Scale Effects of Best/Worst Rank Ordered Choice Data to Estimate Benefits of Tourism in Alpine Grazing Commons

Riccardo Scarpa, Sandra Notaro, Jordan Louviere, Roberta Raffaelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In many environmental valuation applications standard sample sizes for choice modelling surveys are impractical to achieve. One can improve data quality using more in-depth surveys administered to fewer respondents. We report on a study using high quality rank-ordered data elicited with the best-worst approach. The resulting "exploded logit" choice model, estimated on 64 responses per person, was used to study the willingness to pay for external benefits by visitors for policies which maintain the cultural heritage of alpine grazing commons. We find evidence supporting this approach and reasonable estimates of mean WTP, which appear theoretically valid and policy informative. © The Author (2011).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)813-828
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume93
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring Scale Effects of Best/Worst Rank Ordered Choice Data to Estimate Benefits of Tourism in Alpine Grazing Commons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this