Factors affecting transition to second year of an engineering degree

Jonathan Cole, Daniel Thompson, Patrick Boyd

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Much research has focused on students’ transition from secondary school to university. Less is known about the transition from first to second year of a university degree programme. Given the difficulties that many students face at this stage of their education, research into the relevant factors is required. Through questionnaires and focus groups, views of second- and third-year aerospace and mechanical engineering students in our university have been gathered. A large majority believed that both the volume and difficulty of work increased in second year. Many stated that first year was slightly too trivial and could have been made more challenging to prepare them better for second year. Different teaching and assessment styles in second year were considered to affect attendance and performance. The survey revealed that students were generally very well settled into university life by the end of first year and were happy with their choice of course and only 23% reported that financial responsibilities have had a negative effect on their academic performance. Differences were observed between male and female students. Male students believed that transition was helped by having regular assessments and by worked examples in lectures. Females found the teaching staff were the most helpful factor for a successful transition. The results indicate that males require more structure and guidance whereas females are more independent and settle in better.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationConference Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Engineering Education
EditorsPlaton Kapranos
Pages238-245
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016
EventISEE 2016: Interdisciplinary Engineering - Breaking Boundaries - University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Duration: 14 Jul 201615 Jul 2016

Conference

ConferenceISEE 2016
CountryUnited Kingdom
CitySheffield
Period14/07/201615/07/2016

Fingerprint

engineering
university
student
mechanical engineering
female student
performance
secondary school
responsibility
questionnaire
Teaching
education
Group

Keywords

  • transition
  • second year
  • engineering
  • student interviews

Cite this

Cole, J., Thompson, D., & Boyd, P. (2016). Factors affecting transition to second year of an engineering degree. In P. Kapranos (Ed.), Conference Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Engineering Education (pp. 238-245)
Cole, Jonathan ; Thompson, Daniel ; Boyd, Patrick. / Factors affecting transition to second year of an engineering degree. Conference Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Engineering Education . editor / Platon Kapranos. 2016. pp. 238-245
@inproceedings{2a53559fd73e4de3ada34898ab687e32,
title = "Factors affecting transition to second year of an engineering degree",
abstract = "Much research has focused on students’ transition from secondary school to university. Less is known about the transition from first to second year of a university degree programme. Given the difficulties that many students face at this stage of their education, research into the relevant factors is required. Through questionnaires and focus groups, views of second- and third-year aerospace and mechanical engineering students in our university have been gathered. A large majority believed that both the volume and difficulty of work increased in second year. Many stated that first year was slightly too trivial and could have been made more challenging to prepare them better for second year. Different teaching and assessment styles in second year were considered to affect attendance and performance. The survey revealed that students were generally very well settled into university life by the end of first year and were happy with their choice of course and only 23{\%} reported that financial responsibilities have had a negative effect on their academic performance. Differences were observed between male and female students. Male students believed that transition was helped by having regular assessments and by worked examples in lectures. Females found the teaching staff were the most helpful factor for a successful transition. The results indicate that males require more structure and guidance whereas females are more independent and settle in better.",
keywords = "transition, second year, engineering, student interviews",
author = "Jonathan Cole and Daniel Thompson and Patrick Boyd",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-9930611-1-0",
pages = "238--245",
editor = "Platon Kapranos",
booktitle = "Conference Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Engineering Education",

}

Cole, J, Thompson, D & Boyd, P 2016, Factors affecting transition to second year of an engineering degree. in P Kapranos (ed.), Conference Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Engineering Education . pp. 238-245, ISEE 2016, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 14/07/2016.

Factors affecting transition to second year of an engineering degree. / Cole, Jonathan; Thompson, Daniel; Boyd, Patrick.

Conference Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Engineering Education . ed. / Platon Kapranos. 2016. p. 238-245.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Factors affecting transition to second year of an engineering degree

AU - Cole, Jonathan

AU - Thompson, Daniel

AU - Boyd, Patrick

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - Much research has focused on students’ transition from secondary school to university. Less is known about the transition from first to second year of a university degree programme. Given the difficulties that many students face at this stage of their education, research into the relevant factors is required. Through questionnaires and focus groups, views of second- and third-year aerospace and mechanical engineering students in our university have been gathered. A large majority believed that both the volume and difficulty of work increased in second year. Many stated that first year was slightly too trivial and could have been made more challenging to prepare them better for second year. Different teaching and assessment styles in second year were considered to affect attendance and performance. The survey revealed that students were generally very well settled into university life by the end of first year and were happy with their choice of course and only 23% reported that financial responsibilities have had a negative effect on their academic performance. Differences were observed between male and female students. Male students believed that transition was helped by having regular assessments and by worked examples in lectures. Females found the teaching staff were the most helpful factor for a successful transition. The results indicate that males require more structure and guidance whereas females are more independent and settle in better.

AB - Much research has focused on students’ transition from secondary school to university. Less is known about the transition from first to second year of a university degree programme. Given the difficulties that many students face at this stage of their education, research into the relevant factors is required. Through questionnaires and focus groups, views of second- and third-year aerospace and mechanical engineering students in our university have been gathered. A large majority believed that both the volume and difficulty of work increased in second year. Many stated that first year was slightly too trivial and could have been made more challenging to prepare them better for second year. Different teaching and assessment styles in second year were considered to affect attendance and performance. The survey revealed that students were generally very well settled into university life by the end of first year and were happy with their choice of course and only 23% reported that financial responsibilities have had a negative effect on their academic performance. Differences were observed between male and female students. Male students believed that transition was helped by having regular assessments and by worked examples in lectures. Females found the teaching staff were the most helpful factor for a successful transition. The results indicate that males require more structure and guidance whereas females are more independent and settle in better.

KW - transition

KW - second year

KW - engineering

KW - student interviews

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-0-9930611-1-0

SP - 238

EP - 245

BT - Conference Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Engineering Education

A2 - Kapranos, Platon

ER -

Cole J, Thompson D, Boyd P. Factors affecting transition to second year of an engineering degree. In Kapranos P, editor, Conference Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Engineering Education . 2016. p. 238-245