Fake news in Strasbourg: electoral disinformation and freedom of expression in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning the right to freedom of expression and considers relevant jurisprudence in the context of electoral disinformation. Despite growing academic focus on the harmful effects of disinformation on electoral democracy, there have been persistent legal concerns surrounding how restrictions on false information could chill freedom of expression. At present, legal responses to disinformation across Europe are in flux. While there are growing shifts away from self-regulation and towards co-regulation at the EU level, it is unclear as to how stronger rules to curb false information can remain consistent with freedom of expression safeguards under international human rights law. This concern is also relevant when considering shifts in national laws across Europe, as numerous states have introduced restrictive legislation to tackle online falsehoods and have failed to provide adequate human rights safeguards.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Law and Technology
Volume13
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fake news in Strasbourg: electoral disinformation and freedom of expression in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this