Famine and land in Ireland and India 1845-1880: James Caird and the political economy of hunger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)


The perception of Ireland and India as ‘zones of famine’ led many nineteenth-century observers to draw analogies between these two troublesome parts of the British empire. This article investigates this parallel through the career of James Caird (1816–92), and specifically his interventions in the latter stages of both the Great Irish Famine of 1845–50, and the Indian famines of 1876–9. Caird is best remembered as the joint author of the controversial dissenting minute in the Indian famine commission report of 1880; this article locates the roots of his stance in his previous engagements with Irish policy. Caird's interventions are used to track the trajectory of an evolving ‘Peelite’ position on famine relief, agricultural reconstruction, and land reform between the 1840s and 1880s. Despite some divergences, strong continuities exist between the two interventions – not least concern for the promotion of agricultural entrepreneurship, for actively assisting economic development in ‘backward’ economies, and an acknowledgement of state responsibility for preserving life as an end in itself. Above all in both cases it involved a critique of a laissez-faire dogmatism – whether manifest in the ‘Trevelyanism’ of 1846–50 or the Lytton–Temple system of 1876–9.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-215
Number of pages23
JournalHistorical Journal
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History


Dive into the research topics of 'Famine and land in Ireland and India 1845-1880: James Caird and the political economy of hunger'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this