Feed Value of Barn-Dried Hays from Permanent Grassland: A Comparison with Fresh Forage

Donato Andueza, Fabienne Picard , Philippe Pradel , Katerina Theodoridou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
52 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In mountain areas, hays are the main forage in winter diets for livestock. Barn-dried hays can be an alternative to traditional hays, which are generally characterized by a low feed value. The aim of this study was to compare the feed value of barn-dried hays with that of the fresh forage from a permanent meadow. The study was carried out over three periods during the first growth cycle of the meadow’s vegetation (from 30 May to 3 June, from 13 to 17 June, and from 27 June to 1 July). Fresh forage and barn-dried hays of the same fresh forages were tested for dry matter digestibility (DMD), organic matter digestibility (OMD), and voluntary intake (VI). Both types of forage obtained each period were tested with an interval of 15 days. Chemical composition and OMD of forages did not change (p > 0.05) according to the feeding method. However, the DMD values for barn-dried hays were higher (p < 0.05) than for fresh forages at the end of the cycle. VI and digestible organic matter intake of barn-dried hays were higher (p < 0.05) than that of fresh forages. In conclusion, barn-dried hays obtained from permanent grasslands presented a higher feed value than fresh forages.
Original languageEnglish
Article number273
Number of pages11
JournalAGRONOMY
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2019

Fingerprint

permanent grasslands
barns
nutritive value
forage
digestibility
voluntary intake
organic matter
meadows
feeding methods
livestock
chemical composition
mountains
vegetation
winter

Cite this

Andueza, Donato ; Picard , Fabienne ; Pradel , Philippe ; Theodoridou, Katerina. / Feed Value of Barn-Dried Hays from Permanent Grassland: A Comparison with Fresh Forage. In: AGRONOMY. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 6.
@article{822ebd6d356842c1ac4dacd99ef8bd64,
title = "Feed Value of Barn-Dried Hays from Permanent Grassland: A Comparison with Fresh Forage",
abstract = "In mountain areas, hays are the main forage in winter diets for livestock. Barn-dried hays can be an alternative to traditional hays, which are generally characterized by a low feed value. The aim of this study was to compare the feed value of barn-dried hays with that of the fresh forage from a permanent meadow. The study was carried out over three periods during the first growth cycle of the meadow’s vegetation (from 30 May to 3 June, from 13 to 17 June, and from 27 June to 1 July). Fresh forage and barn-dried hays of the same fresh forages were tested for dry matter digestibility (DMD), organic matter digestibility (OMD), and voluntary intake (VI). Both types of forage obtained each period were tested with an interval of 15 days. Chemical composition and OMD of forages did not change (p > 0.05) according to the feeding method. However, the DMD values for barn-dried hays were higher (p < 0.05) than for fresh forages at the end of the cycle. VI and digestible organic matter intake of barn-dried hays were higher (p < 0.05) than that of fresh forages. In conclusion, barn-dried hays obtained from permanent grasslands presented a higher feed value than fresh forages.",
author = "Donato Andueza and Fabienne Picard and Philippe Pradel and Katerina Theodoridou",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.3390/agronomy9060273",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "AGRONOMY",
issn = "2073-4395",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "6",

}

Feed Value of Barn-Dried Hays from Permanent Grassland: A Comparison with Fresh Forage. / Andueza, Donato; Picard , Fabienne ; Pradel , Philippe ; Theodoridou, Katerina.

In: AGRONOMY, Vol. 9, No. 6, 273, 30.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feed Value of Barn-Dried Hays from Permanent Grassland: A Comparison with Fresh Forage

AU - Andueza, Donato

AU - Picard , Fabienne

AU - Pradel , Philippe

AU - Theodoridou, Katerina

PY - 2019/5/30

Y1 - 2019/5/30

N2 - In mountain areas, hays are the main forage in winter diets for livestock. Barn-dried hays can be an alternative to traditional hays, which are generally characterized by a low feed value. The aim of this study was to compare the feed value of barn-dried hays with that of the fresh forage from a permanent meadow. The study was carried out over three periods during the first growth cycle of the meadow’s vegetation (from 30 May to 3 June, from 13 to 17 June, and from 27 June to 1 July). Fresh forage and barn-dried hays of the same fresh forages were tested for dry matter digestibility (DMD), organic matter digestibility (OMD), and voluntary intake (VI). Both types of forage obtained each period were tested with an interval of 15 days. Chemical composition and OMD of forages did not change (p > 0.05) according to the feeding method. However, the DMD values for barn-dried hays were higher (p < 0.05) than for fresh forages at the end of the cycle. VI and digestible organic matter intake of barn-dried hays were higher (p < 0.05) than that of fresh forages. In conclusion, barn-dried hays obtained from permanent grasslands presented a higher feed value than fresh forages.

AB - In mountain areas, hays are the main forage in winter diets for livestock. Barn-dried hays can be an alternative to traditional hays, which are generally characterized by a low feed value. The aim of this study was to compare the feed value of barn-dried hays with that of the fresh forage from a permanent meadow. The study was carried out over three periods during the first growth cycle of the meadow’s vegetation (from 30 May to 3 June, from 13 to 17 June, and from 27 June to 1 July). Fresh forage and barn-dried hays of the same fresh forages were tested for dry matter digestibility (DMD), organic matter digestibility (OMD), and voluntary intake (VI). Both types of forage obtained each period were tested with an interval of 15 days. Chemical composition and OMD of forages did not change (p > 0.05) according to the feeding method. However, the DMD values for barn-dried hays were higher (p < 0.05) than for fresh forages at the end of the cycle. VI and digestible organic matter intake of barn-dried hays were higher (p < 0.05) than that of fresh forages. In conclusion, barn-dried hays obtained from permanent grasslands presented a higher feed value than fresh forages.

U2 - 10.3390/agronomy9060273

DO - 10.3390/agronomy9060273

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - AGRONOMY

JF - AGRONOMY

SN - 2073-4395

IS - 6

M1 - 273

ER -