Feminist and trans perspectives on identity and the UK Gender Recognition Act

Paddy McQueen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
3354 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines Sheila Jeffreys’ analysis of the UK’s Gender Recognition Act (GRA) and her critique of trans identities. Situating her position within a wider radical feminist perspective, I suggest that her arguments against the GRA are grounded in a problematic understanding of sex and gender. In so doing, I defend how sex and gender are understood in the GRA. Furthermore, I show that radical feminist concerns about sex reassignment surgery and the complicity of trans individuals with stereotypical gender norms are unwarranted. By highlighting the importance of attending to the embodied dimensions of sex and gender, I offer a partial defence of the UK’s GRA. In particular, I note the benefits that it can offer to trans individuals, although I suggest ways in which the GRA can be improved. Finally, I challenge radical feminists who see trans theory and identities as inimical to the goals of feminism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)671-87
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volume18
Issue number3
Early online date20 May 2016
Publication statusPublished - 01 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feminist and trans perspectives on identity and the UK Gender Recognition Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this