Filtration procedures supplemented with mitomycin C in the management of childhood glaucoma

A. Azuara-Blanco, R.P. Wilson, G.L. Spaeth, C.M. Schmidt, J.J. Augsburger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims - To evaluate the outcome of filtering procedures supplemented with mitomycin C in children with glaucoma. Methods - All patients aged 17 or younger with glaucoma who underwent filtering surgery supplemented with mitomycin C at a tertiary care centre (n = 21) during a 5 year interval (1992 and 1996) were included. One eye for each patient was entered into the analysis. The postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), use of antiglaucoma medications, clinical stability of glaucoma, complications, and visual acuity were retrospectively evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the probability of success. Results - At the time of surgery mean age was 5.7 (SD 5.0) years. The most common diagnoses were trabeculodysgenesis (n = 6) and aphakic glaucoma (n = 8). Mean IOP before surgery was 35.7 (10.5) mmHg. Average length of follow up was 18.6 (14.7) months. The probability of having IOP less than 21 mmHg with no antiglaucoma medications and with clinically stable glaucoma 1 year after surgery was 76.9% in phakic eyes (n = 13) and 0% in aphakic eyes (n = 8). A phakic patient with Sturge-Weber's syndrome had choroidal effusion after surgery that resolved spontaneously. In the aphakic group one patient had retinal detachment and another developed an encapsulated bleb. Visual acuity deteriorated in one patient. Conclusion - A guarded filtration procedure with mitomycin C is relatively successful in phakic children with glaucoma, but unsuccessful in aphakic ones.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-156
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume83
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 1999

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Filtration procedures supplemented with mitomycin C in the management of childhood glaucoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this