Financial Disputes in International Courts

Federico Lupo Pasini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The question of adjudication in international financial law has rarely been analysedcomprehensively in the legal literature. This can probably be explained with the factthat, unlike in other areas of international economic law, there is no internationalfinancial court specifically designed to adjudicate international disputes between financial regulators, or between governments and financial institutions or investors.Moreover, the informality of regulatory cooperation through Transnational RegulatoryNetworks (TRNs), the use of soft laws to regulate international financial relations, andthe presence of prudential carve-outs in international treaties was supposed to keepfinancial supervisory and regulatory authorities free from international scrutiny and tolimit the judicial review of regulatory measures to a purely domestic exercise. Yet, financial measures are increasingly challenged in international investment tribunals, human rights courts, and regional courts. From 1995 to 2016, there have been more than 100 known international disputes on financial services, of which roughly two thirds involved a supervisory measure such as the resolution or bankruptcy of an insolvent bank or the imposition of supervisory fines. The remaining claims mostly included violation of sovereign debt contracts, or emergency legislation affecting financial services. Investment arbitrations, in particular, are considerably on the rise. The increased number of regulatory disputes represents fundamental implications for the financial regulatory community in terms of domestic governance, regulatory cooperation, and global financial stability.This essay empirically investigates and maps for the first time the patterns of international adjudication in financial law, and comments on what the rise of international litigation means for the global financial architecture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-30
JournalJOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

financial service
Law
supervisory authority
economic law
regulatory authority
international economics
arbitration
Dispute
bankruptcy
international agreement
international law
investor
indebtedness
bank
human rights
legislation
governance
Adjudication
Rise
Financial services

Keywords

  • financial disputes
  • adjudication
  • courts
  • Court decisions
  • International Financial Regulation
  • international financial law
  • international law
  • international investment law
  • International Trade Law
  • WTO; EU; FTA
  • financial stability

Cite this

Lupo Pasini, Federico. / Financial Disputes in International Courts. In: JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 1-30.
@article{102a38e48b1c4435aaa7b23a0f1967db,
title = "Financial Disputes in International Courts",
abstract = "The question of adjudication in international financial law has rarely been analysedcomprehensively in the legal literature. This can probably be explained with the factthat, unlike in other areas of international economic law, there is no internationalfinancial court specifically designed to adjudicate international disputes between financial regulators, or between governments and financial institutions or investors.Moreover, the informality of regulatory cooperation through Transnational RegulatoryNetworks (TRNs), the use of soft laws to regulate international financial relations, andthe presence of prudential carve-outs in international treaties was supposed to keepfinancial supervisory and regulatory authorities free from international scrutiny and tolimit the judicial review of regulatory measures to a purely domestic exercise. Yet, financial measures are increasingly challenged in international investment tribunals, human rights courts, and regional courts. From 1995 to 2016, there have been more than 100 known international disputes on financial services, of which roughly two thirds involved a supervisory measure such as the resolution or bankruptcy of an insolvent bank or the imposition of supervisory fines. The remaining claims mostly included violation of sovereign debt contracts, or emergency legislation affecting financial services. Investment arbitrations, in particular, are considerably on the rise. The increased number of regulatory disputes represents fundamental implications for the financial regulatory community in terms of domestic governance, regulatory cooperation, and global financial stability.This essay empirically investigates and maps for the first time the patterns of international adjudication in financial law, and comments on what the rise of international litigation means for the global financial architecture.",
keywords = "financial disputes, adjudication, courts, Court decisions, International Financial Regulation, international financial law, international law, international investment law, International Trade Law, WTO; EU; FTA, financial stability",
author = "{Lupo Pasini}, Federico",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1093/jiel/jgy007",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1--30",
journal = "JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW",
issn = "1369-3034",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Financial Disputes in International Courts. / Lupo Pasini, Federico.

In: JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, Vol. 21, No. 1, 19.03.2018, p. 1-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Financial Disputes in International Courts

AU - Lupo Pasini, Federico

PY - 2018/3/19

Y1 - 2018/3/19

N2 - The question of adjudication in international financial law has rarely been analysedcomprehensively in the legal literature. This can probably be explained with the factthat, unlike in other areas of international economic law, there is no internationalfinancial court specifically designed to adjudicate international disputes between financial regulators, or between governments and financial institutions or investors.Moreover, the informality of regulatory cooperation through Transnational RegulatoryNetworks (TRNs), the use of soft laws to regulate international financial relations, andthe presence of prudential carve-outs in international treaties was supposed to keepfinancial supervisory and regulatory authorities free from international scrutiny and tolimit the judicial review of regulatory measures to a purely domestic exercise. Yet, financial measures are increasingly challenged in international investment tribunals, human rights courts, and regional courts. From 1995 to 2016, there have been more than 100 known international disputes on financial services, of which roughly two thirds involved a supervisory measure such as the resolution or bankruptcy of an insolvent bank or the imposition of supervisory fines. The remaining claims mostly included violation of sovereign debt contracts, or emergency legislation affecting financial services. Investment arbitrations, in particular, are considerably on the rise. The increased number of regulatory disputes represents fundamental implications for the financial regulatory community in terms of domestic governance, regulatory cooperation, and global financial stability.This essay empirically investigates and maps for the first time the patterns of international adjudication in financial law, and comments on what the rise of international litigation means for the global financial architecture.

AB - The question of adjudication in international financial law has rarely been analysedcomprehensively in the legal literature. This can probably be explained with the factthat, unlike in other areas of international economic law, there is no internationalfinancial court specifically designed to adjudicate international disputes between financial regulators, or between governments and financial institutions or investors.Moreover, the informality of regulatory cooperation through Transnational RegulatoryNetworks (TRNs), the use of soft laws to regulate international financial relations, andthe presence of prudential carve-outs in international treaties was supposed to keepfinancial supervisory and regulatory authorities free from international scrutiny and tolimit the judicial review of regulatory measures to a purely domestic exercise. Yet, financial measures are increasingly challenged in international investment tribunals, human rights courts, and regional courts. From 1995 to 2016, there have been more than 100 known international disputes on financial services, of which roughly two thirds involved a supervisory measure such as the resolution or bankruptcy of an insolvent bank or the imposition of supervisory fines. The remaining claims mostly included violation of sovereign debt contracts, or emergency legislation affecting financial services. Investment arbitrations, in particular, are considerably on the rise. The increased number of regulatory disputes represents fundamental implications for the financial regulatory community in terms of domestic governance, regulatory cooperation, and global financial stability.This essay empirically investigates and maps for the first time the patterns of international adjudication in financial law, and comments on what the rise of international litigation means for the global financial architecture.

KW - financial disputes

KW - adjudication

KW - courts

KW - Court decisions

KW - International Financial Regulation

KW - international financial law

KW - international law

KW - international investment law

KW - International Trade Law

KW - WTO; EU; FTA

KW - financial stability

U2 - 10.1093/jiel/jgy007

DO - 10.1093/jiel/jgy007

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1

EP - 30

JO - JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW

JF - JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW

SN - 1369-3034

IS - 1

ER -