Finite Element Modelling of FRP Strengthened Restrained Concrete Slabs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers the use of Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis (NLFEA) to predict the load capacity of a range of experimentally tested in-plane restrained reinforced concrete slabs which experienced internal arching effects under loading. The slabs were constructed at one third scale and strengthened with basalt fibre reinforced polymer (BFRP) or carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) bonded in place using the near surface mounted (NSM) technique. As the research was representative of existing floor slabs within reinforced concrete building frames, all test specimens were constructed with normal strength concrete (~40N/mm2) and 0.15% steel reinforcement. One tenth of one percent fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) was used to strengthen samples which were compared with unstrengthened control specimens. The London University Structural Analysis System (LUSAS) finite element analysis software package was used to model all test samples using experimentally derived material test values.

Experiments and NLFEA models were compared with the Queen’s University Belfast (QUB) arching theory which showed that LUSAS was slightly more accurate than the QUB arching theory in predicting slab capacity. However, the QUB arching theory was found to be slightly more consistent in estimating slab capacities compared with LUSAS. Yet, both of these methods were significantly better at predicting slab capacities than existing Eurocode and American Concrete Institute codes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages101-119
Number of pages19
JournalEngineering Structures
Volume187
Early online date28 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2019

Fingerprint

Concrete slabs
Structural analysis
Finite element method
Reinforced concrete
Fibers
Polymers
Concretes
Concrete buildings
Basalt
Software packages
Carbon fibers
Reinforcement
Computer systems
Steel
Experiments

Keywords

  • Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis, NLFEA, LUSAS, Near surface mounted, NSM, Fibre reinforced polymer, basalt fibre reinforced polymer, carbon fibre reinforced polymer, FRP, BFRP, CFRP, strengthening, concrete, in-plane lateral restraint, arching, compressive membrane action.

Cite this

@article{88f4dadbd1d7456aa46dd03cb0416b58,
title = "Finite Element Modelling of FRP Strengthened Restrained Concrete Slabs",
abstract = "This paper considers the use of Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis (NLFEA) to predict the load capacity of a range of experimentally tested in-plane restrained reinforced concrete slabs which experienced internal arching effects under loading. The slabs were constructed at one third scale and strengthened with basalt fibre reinforced polymer (BFRP) or carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) bonded in place using the near surface mounted (NSM) technique. As the research was representative of existing floor slabs within reinforced concrete building frames, all test specimens were constructed with normal strength concrete (~40N/mm2) and 0.15{\%} steel reinforcement. One tenth of one percent fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) was used to strengthen samples which were compared with unstrengthened control specimens. The London University Structural Analysis System (LUSAS) finite element analysis software package was used to model all test samples using experimentally derived material test values. Experiments and NLFEA models were compared with the Queen’s University Belfast (QUB) arching theory which showed that LUSAS was slightly more accurate than the QUB arching theory in predicting slab capacity. However, the QUB arching theory was found to be slightly more consistent in estimating slab capacities compared with LUSAS. Yet, both of these methods were significantly better at predicting slab capacities than existing Eurocode and American Concrete Institute codes.",
keywords = "Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis, NLFEA, LUSAS, Near surface mounted, NSM, Fibre reinforced polymer, basalt fibre reinforced polymer, carbon fibre reinforced polymer, FRP, BFRP, CFRP, strengthening, concrete, in-plane lateral restraint, arching, compressive membrane action.",
author = "Anthony Martin and Susan Taylor and Desmond Robinson and David Cleland",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.035",
language = "English",
volume = "187",
pages = "101--119",
journal = "Engineering Structures",
issn = "0141-0296",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finite Element Modelling of FRP Strengthened Restrained Concrete Slabs

AU - Martin, Anthony

AU - Taylor, Susan

AU - Robinson, Desmond

AU - Cleland, David

PY - 2019/5/15

Y1 - 2019/5/15

N2 - This paper considers the use of Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis (NLFEA) to predict the load capacity of a range of experimentally tested in-plane restrained reinforced concrete slabs which experienced internal arching effects under loading. The slabs were constructed at one third scale and strengthened with basalt fibre reinforced polymer (BFRP) or carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) bonded in place using the near surface mounted (NSM) technique. As the research was representative of existing floor slabs within reinforced concrete building frames, all test specimens were constructed with normal strength concrete (~40N/mm2) and 0.15% steel reinforcement. One tenth of one percent fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) was used to strengthen samples which were compared with unstrengthened control specimens. The London University Structural Analysis System (LUSAS) finite element analysis software package was used to model all test samples using experimentally derived material test values. Experiments and NLFEA models were compared with the Queen’s University Belfast (QUB) arching theory which showed that LUSAS was slightly more accurate than the QUB arching theory in predicting slab capacity. However, the QUB arching theory was found to be slightly more consistent in estimating slab capacities compared with LUSAS. Yet, both of these methods were significantly better at predicting slab capacities than existing Eurocode and American Concrete Institute codes.

AB - This paper considers the use of Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis (NLFEA) to predict the load capacity of a range of experimentally tested in-plane restrained reinforced concrete slabs which experienced internal arching effects under loading. The slabs were constructed at one third scale and strengthened with basalt fibre reinforced polymer (BFRP) or carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) bonded in place using the near surface mounted (NSM) technique. As the research was representative of existing floor slabs within reinforced concrete building frames, all test specimens were constructed with normal strength concrete (~40N/mm2) and 0.15% steel reinforcement. One tenth of one percent fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) was used to strengthen samples which were compared with unstrengthened control specimens. The London University Structural Analysis System (LUSAS) finite element analysis software package was used to model all test samples using experimentally derived material test values. Experiments and NLFEA models were compared with the Queen’s University Belfast (QUB) arching theory which showed that LUSAS was slightly more accurate than the QUB arching theory in predicting slab capacity. However, the QUB arching theory was found to be slightly more consistent in estimating slab capacities compared with LUSAS. Yet, both of these methods were significantly better at predicting slab capacities than existing Eurocode and American Concrete Institute codes.

KW - Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis, NLFEA, LUSAS, Near surface mounted, NSM, Fibre reinforced polymer, basalt fibre reinforced polymer, carbon fibre reinforced polymer, FRP, BFRP, CFRP, strengthening, concrete, in-plane lateral restraint, arching, compress

U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.035

DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.035

M3 - Article

VL - 187

SP - 101

EP - 119

JO - Engineering Structures

T2 - Engineering Structures

JF - Engineering Structures

SN - 0141-0296

ER -