Food Labels, Autonomy and the Right (Not) to Know

Matteo Bonotti

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Food labelling has been overlooked in the emerging body of literature concerning the normative dimensions of food and drink policies. In this paper, I argue that arguments normally advanced in bioethics and medical ethics regarding the “right to know” and the “right not to know” can provide useful normative guidelines for critically assessing existing and proposed food labelling regimes. More specifically, I claim that food labelling ought to respect the legitimate interests and the autonomy of both consumers who seek knowledge about their food in order to make informed dietary choices and consumers who prefer to remain ignorant about the contents and effects of their food in order to avoid the emotional and psychological harm, or more simply the loss of enjoyment, which may result from receiving that information.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)301-321
    Number of pages21
    JournalKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    Volume24
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

    Fingerprint

    Food Labeling
    autonomy
    food
    Food
    Nutrition Policy
    Medical Ethics
    Bioethics
    Guidelines
    Psychology
    medical ethics
    bioethics
    Autonomy
    respect
    regime
    Labeling

    Cite this

    Bonotti, Matteo. / Food Labels, Autonomy and the Right (Not) to Know. In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 301-321.
    @article{520c40f357a84b56b0b65dbfe88cdc5e,
    title = "Food Labels, Autonomy and the Right (Not) to Know",
    abstract = "Food labelling has been overlooked in the emerging body of literature concerning the normative dimensions of food and drink policies. In this paper, I argue that arguments normally advanced in bioethics and medical ethics regarding the “right to know” and the “right not to know” can provide useful normative guidelines for critically assessing existing and proposed food labelling regimes. More specifically, I claim that food labelling ought to respect the legitimate interests and the autonomy of both consumers who seek knowledge about their food in order to make informed dietary choices and consumers who prefer to remain ignorant about the contents and effects of their food in order to avoid the emotional and psychological harm, or more simply the loss of enjoyment, which may result from receiving that information.",
    author = "Matteo Bonotti",
    year = "2014",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1353/ken.2014.0032",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "301--321",
    journal = "Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal",
    issn = "1054-6863",
    publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    Food Labels, Autonomy and the Right (Not) to Know. / Bonotti, Matteo.

    In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, 12.2014, p. 301-321.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Food Labels, Autonomy and the Right (Not) to Know

    AU - Bonotti, Matteo

    PY - 2014/12

    Y1 - 2014/12

    N2 - Food labelling has been overlooked in the emerging body of literature concerning the normative dimensions of food and drink policies. In this paper, I argue that arguments normally advanced in bioethics and medical ethics regarding the “right to know” and the “right not to know” can provide useful normative guidelines for critically assessing existing and proposed food labelling regimes. More specifically, I claim that food labelling ought to respect the legitimate interests and the autonomy of both consumers who seek knowledge about their food in order to make informed dietary choices and consumers who prefer to remain ignorant about the contents and effects of their food in order to avoid the emotional and psychological harm, or more simply the loss of enjoyment, which may result from receiving that information.

    AB - Food labelling has been overlooked in the emerging body of literature concerning the normative dimensions of food and drink policies. In this paper, I argue that arguments normally advanced in bioethics and medical ethics regarding the “right to know” and the “right not to know” can provide useful normative guidelines for critically assessing existing and proposed food labelling regimes. More specifically, I claim that food labelling ought to respect the legitimate interests and the autonomy of both consumers who seek knowledge about their food in order to make informed dietary choices and consumers who prefer to remain ignorant about the contents and effects of their food in order to avoid the emotional and psychological harm, or more simply the loss of enjoyment, which may result from receiving that information.

    U2 - 10.1353/ken.2014.0032

    DO - 10.1353/ken.2014.0032

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 301

    EP - 321

    JO - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

    JF - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

    SN - 1054-6863

    IS - 4

    ER -