Global Systemic Risk and International Regulatory Coordination: Squaring Sovereignty and Financial Stability

Federico Lupo Pasini, Ross Buckley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In recent years much attention has been given to systemic risk and maintaining financial stability. Much of the focus, rightly, has been on market failures and the role of regulation in addressing them. This article looks at the role of domestic policies and government actions as sources of global instability. The global financial system is built upon global markets controlled by national financial and macroeconomic policies. In this context, regulatory asymmetries, diverging policy preferences, and government failures add a further dimension to global systemic risk not present at the national level.
Systemic risk is a result of the interplay between two independent variables: an underlying trigger event, in this analysis a domestic policy measure, and a transmission channel. The solution to systemic risk requires tackling one of these variables. In a domestic setting, the centralization of regulatory power into one single authority makes it easier to balance the delicate equilibrium between enhancing efficiency and reducing instability. However, in a global financial system in which national financial policies serve to maximize economic welfare, regulators will be confronted with difficult policy and legal tradeoffs.
We investigate the role that financial regulation plays in addressing domestic policy failures and in controlling the danger of global financial interdependence. To do so we analyse global financial interconnectedness, and explain its role in transmitting instability; we investigate the political economy dynamics at the origin of regulatory asymmetries and government failures; and we discuss the limits of regulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-741
Number of pages76
JournalAmerican University International Law Review
Volume30
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

sovereignty
domestic policy
financial system
regulation
asymmetry
welfare economics
economic policy
market failure
centralization
interdependence
political economy
efficiency
Financial stability
Sovereignty
Systemic risk
event
market
Financial policy
Financial system
Government failure

Keywords

  • Systemic Risk
  • Global Systemic Risk
  • Financial Instability
  • International Financial Regulation
  • Financial Sovereignty
  • Regulatory Coordination

Cite this

@article{144ee283eeca4616ad80765458ceae85,
title = "Global Systemic Risk and International Regulatory Coordination: Squaring Sovereignty and Financial Stability",
abstract = "In recent years much attention has been given to systemic risk and maintaining financial stability. Much of the focus, rightly, has been on market failures and the role of regulation in addressing them. This article looks at the role of domestic policies and government actions as sources of global instability. The global financial system is built upon global markets controlled by national financial and macroeconomic policies. In this context, regulatory asymmetries, diverging policy preferences, and government failures add a further dimension to global systemic risk not present at the national level.Systemic risk is a result of the interplay between two independent variables: an underlying trigger event, in this analysis a domestic policy measure, and a transmission channel. The solution to systemic risk requires tackling one of these variables. In a domestic setting, the centralization of regulatory power into one single authority makes it easier to balance the delicate equilibrium between enhancing efficiency and reducing instability. However, in a global financial system in which national financial policies serve to maximize economic welfare, regulators will be confronted with difficult policy and legal tradeoffs. We investigate the role that financial regulation plays in addressing domestic policy failures and in controlling the danger of global financial interdependence. To do so we analyse global financial interconnectedness, and explain its role in transmitting instability; we investigate the political economy dynamics at the origin of regulatory asymmetries and government failures; and we discuss the limits of regulation.",
keywords = "Systemic Risk, Global Systemic Risk, Financial Instability, International Financial Regulation, Financial Sovereignty, Regulatory Coordination",
author = "{Lupo Pasini}, Federico and Ross Buckley",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "665--741",
journal = "American University International Law Review",
issn = "1520-460X",
number = "4",

}

Global Systemic Risk and International Regulatory Coordination: Squaring Sovereignty and Financial Stability. / Lupo Pasini, Federico; Buckley, Ross.

In: American University International Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2015, p. 665-741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global Systemic Risk and International Regulatory Coordination: Squaring Sovereignty and Financial Stability

AU - Lupo Pasini, Federico

AU - Buckley, Ross

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In recent years much attention has been given to systemic risk and maintaining financial stability. Much of the focus, rightly, has been on market failures and the role of regulation in addressing them. This article looks at the role of domestic policies and government actions as sources of global instability. The global financial system is built upon global markets controlled by national financial and macroeconomic policies. In this context, regulatory asymmetries, diverging policy preferences, and government failures add a further dimension to global systemic risk not present at the national level.Systemic risk is a result of the interplay between two independent variables: an underlying trigger event, in this analysis a domestic policy measure, and a transmission channel. The solution to systemic risk requires tackling one of these variables. In a domestic setting, the centralization of regulatory power into one single authority makes it easier to balance the delicate equilibrium between enhancing efficiency and reducing instability. However, in a global financial system in which national financial policies serve to maximize economic welfare, regulators will be confronted with difficult policy and legal tradeoffs. We investigate the role that financial regulation plays in addressing domestic policy failures and in controlling the danger of global financial interdependence. To do so we analyse global financial interconnectedness, and explain its role in transmitting instability; we investigate the political economy dynamics at the origin of regulatory asymmetries and government failures; and we discuss the limits of regulation.

AB - In recent years much attention has been given to systemic risk and maintaining financial stability. Much of the focus, rightly, has been on market failures and the role of regulation in addressing them. This article looks at the role of domestic policies and government actions as sources of global instability. The global financial system is built upon global markets controlled by national financial and macroeconomic policies. In this context, regulatory asymmetries, diverging policy preferences, and government failures add a further dimension to global systemic risk not present at the national level.Systemic risk is a result of the interplay between two independent variables: an underlying trigger event, in this analysis a domestic policy measure, and a transmission channel. The solution to systemic risk requires tackling one of these variables. In a domestic setting, the centralization of regulatory power into one single authority makes it easier to balance the delicate equilibrium between enhancing efficiency and reducing instability. However, in a global financial system in which national financial policies serve to maximize economic welfare, regulators will be confronted with difficult policy and legal tradeoffs. We investigate the role that financial regulation plays in addressing domestic policy failures and in controlling the danger of global financial interdependence. To do so we analyse global financial interconnectedness, and explain its role in transmitting instability; we investigate the political economy dynamics at the origin of regulatory asymmetries and government failures; and we discuss the limits of regulation.

KW - Systemic Risk

KW - Global Systemic Risk

KW - Financial Instability

KW - International Financial Regulation

KW - Financial Sovereignty

KW - Regulatory Coordination

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 665

EP - 741

JO - American University International Law Review

JF - American University International Law Review

SN - 1520-460X

IS - 4

ER -